ArticleCureus2022
A Comparative Analysis of Visual Inspection With Acetic Acid, Cervical Cytology, and Histopathology in the Screening and Early Detection of Premalignant and Malignant Lesions of the Cervix.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A prospective study of vaginal topical pretreatment of compound sea-buckthorn oil suppository in postmenopausal women prior to colposcopy.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Changes of Swede Score in Low-Grade Cervical Precancerous Lesions After Administration ofInternational journal of women's health · 2026Article
- To determine the diagnostic accuracy of visual inspection of cervix with acetic acid as a screening tool to detect preinvasive cervical cancer - A meta-analysis.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2025Review
- Results comparison of cervical cancer early detection using cerviray ® with VIA test.BMC research notes · 2025Observational
- [Validity of visual inspection with acetic acid versus cervical cytology].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2024Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe incidence of cervical cancer and related mortality is growing worldwide. The natural history of disease progression ranges from 10 to 20 years. Hence, effective screening can help in the early detection and prevention of fatal complications. This study aims to (1) compare the sociodemographic characteristics of the women with malignant and premalignant lesions of the cervix, (2) collate the accuracy of visual inspection of the cervix with acetic acid (VIA) with Pap smear cervical cytology in the early detection of premalignant and malignant lesions of the cervix, and (3) standardize it with histopathology, a gold standard screening tool.
methodsThis study was carried out in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Gajra Raja Medical College, Gwalior, India, from October 2020 to March 2021 including all the sexually active women of the reproductive age group and postmenopausal women attending the gynecology outpatient department and the indoor admitted patients. A total of 500 patients were included in the study. The women were subjected to a Pap smear followed by VIA. Punch biopsy was taken from the acetowhite regions and sent for histopathological examination. The women with abnormal cervical cytology results also underwent a biopsy and histopathological examination.
resultsOn comparative analysis, the sensitivity and specificity of Pap smear cytology were found to be 89.5% and 65.2%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of VIA were found to be 94.7% and 88%, respectively. The overall accuracy of VIA testing (93.2%) is more significant than that of Pap smear (68%).
conclusionAccording to our study, it is found that visual inspection with acetic acid is more diagnostically accurate than Pap smear cytology. Hence, VIA testing could be implemented as a primary screening tool with credence. Also, as learned from our study, the premalignant and malignant lesions are more common among elderly women living under a low socioeconomic status. Hence, these groups of women must be outreached and covered through effectively targeted screening programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.