ReviewCureus2022
Comparative Evaluation of Different Post Materials on Stress Distribution in Endodontically Treated Teeth Using the Finite Element Analysis Method: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical performance of custom-milled polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) posts and cores: A 12-month follow-up randomized controlled pilot study.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2024Trial
- The effect of fiber bundle posts used with different core materials on fracture resistance: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Comparative evaluation of fiber and metal posts on mandibular bone microstructure: a fractal dimension analysis.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Fracture strength evaluation for different posts in endodontically treated teeth.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Comparative evaluation of different post materials on stress distribution in endodontically treated teeth: Implications for prosthodontic restorations.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Article
- Mechanical behavior of esthetic CAD/CAM post-core restorations: a 3D finite element analysis.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Stress distribution in endodontically treated and differently restored teeth with periapical lesions: a 3D FEA study.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Correlation Between Homogeneity of Different Composite Resins and Their Adhesion to Glass Fiber Posts: In Vitro Assessment.Dentistry journal · 2025Article
- Stress Behaviour of an Immature Maxillary Central Incisor: A 3D Finite Element Analysis.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Unveiled stress dynamics: the role of post length and repair materials in perforated tooth models: a finite element analysis study.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Stress Evaluation in Endodontically Treated Virtual Teeth Restored with Composite Fillings and Cast or Fiberglass Posts-A Finite Element Analysis.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Evaluation of stress patterns in teeth with endodontic treatment and periapical lesions as abutments for fixed prosthesis: a finite element analysis study.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Surface strain at the cervical area and fracture strength of flared root canals reinforced using a zirconia tube and glass-fiber post.Journal of dental sciences · 2024Article
- Radiographic Assessment of 121 Glass Fiber Post Procedures in 32 Patients Aged 21-60 Years Performed by 6th-Year Dental Students During the 2022-2023 Academic Year at the College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Saudi Arabia.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024Article
- Article
- Veneer crowns in anterior endodontically-treated teeth: A case report with 1-year follow-up.Clinical case reports · 2023Article
- Comparative Stress Analysis of Custom-Made PEEK Dental Post-Cores versus Conventional Post-Cores in Incisor Restorations: A Finite Element Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this systematic review is to summarize and conclude findings to reveal the stress ranges developed by various post materials by finite element analysis. This, in turn, aids in the selection of better post material clinically. The electronic databases PubMed and Google Scholar were searched in this review by using specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Among 14586 articles, 22 articles were included in this systematic review, as they satisfied the eligibility criteria. The search covered all articles published from 1997 to December 2021. All records identified were retrieved and imported into the Rayyan bibliographic software, which is a systematic review screening software. Later, data extraction and analysis of 22 articles were done. Twenty-two articles, which were all finite element analysis studies, were included. Among these, 18 studies used maxillary central incisor scanned models, two studies used a maxillary canine model, and the remaining two used the mandibular premolar model for finite element analysis. All these tooth models are restored with post models made of different materials. This systematic review revealed a difference in stress distribution in endodontically treated teeth when using different post materials. Among 22 studies, 15 studies evaluated glass fiber posts and the results showed that they induce less stress on restored endodontically treated teeth when compared to other posts, with maximum stress concentration at the cervical third of the root. Prefabricated posts like stainless steel and Titanium showed more stress on the restored tooth structure with stress concentration at the cervical and apical third of the root. Prefabricated zirconia also showed more stress on the restored tooth with maximum stress concentration at the middle third of the root.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.