Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36324324›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2022

Recurrent Candidemia: Trends and Risk Factors Among Persons Residing in 4 US States, 2011-2018.

Emma E Seagle, Brendan R Jackson, Shawn R Lockhart, Emily N Jenkins, Andrew Revis, Monica M Farley, Lee H Harrison, William Schaffner, Tiffanie M Markus, Rebecca A Pierce and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Changes in Epidemiology of Candidemia in the United States With a Focus on Candida auris.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Changing Climate, ChangingJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  5. Heterogeneity ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Emma E SeagleASRT, Inc, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2421-4444
Brendan R JacksonMycotic Disease Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Shawn R LockhartMycotic Disease Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Emily N JenkinsASRT, Inc, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Andrew RevisAtlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Monica M FarleyAtlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Lee H HarrisonDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
William SchaffnerVanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Tiffanie M MarkusVanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Rebecca A PierceOregon Public Health Division, Oregon Health Authority, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Alexia Y ZhangOregon Public Health Division, Oregon Health Authority, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Meghan M LymanMycotic Disease Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Candidemia is a common healthcare-associated infection with high mortality. Estimates of recurrence range from 1% to 17%. Few studies have focused on those with recurrent candidemia, who often experience more severe illness and greater treatment failure. We describe recurrent candidemia trends and risk factors. Methods: We analyzed population-based candidemia surveillance data collected during 2011-2018. Persons with >1 episode (defined as the 30-day period after a positive Results: Of the 5428 persons identified with candidemia, 326 (6%) had recurrent infection. Recurrent episodes occurred 1.0 month to 7.6 years after any previous episode. In multivariable logistic regression controlling for surveillance site and year, recurrent candidemia was associated with being 19-44 years old (vs ≥65 years; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3.05 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 2.10-4.44]), being discharged to a private residence (vs medical facility; aOR, 1.53 [95% CI, 1.12-2.08]), hospitalization in the 90 days prior to initial episode (aOR, 1.66 [95% CI, 1.27-2.18]), receipt of total parenteral nutrition (aOR, 2.08 [95% CI, 1.58-2.73]), and hepatitis C infection (aOR, 1.65 [95% CI, 1.12-2.43]). Conclusions: Candidemia recurrence >30 days after initial infection occurred in >1 in 20 persons with candidemia. Associations with younger age and hepatitis C suggest injection drug use may play a modifiable role. Prevention efforts targeting central line care and total parenteral nutrition use may help reduce the risk of recurrent candidemia.

Indexed as

Candidacandidemiafungalhealthcare-associatedrecurrent

Identifiers

PMID36324324
PMCPMC9620433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.