Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36324295›Full record

ArticleThe International journal of eating disorders2022

The factor structure and validity of a diagnostic interview for avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder in a sample of children, adolescents, and young adults.

Christine E Cooper-Vince, Chika Nwaka, Kamryn T Eddy, Madhusmita Misra, Natalia A Hadaway, Kendra R Becker, Elizabeth A Lawson, Lucy Cooke, Rachel Bryant-Waugh, Jennifer J Thomas and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The International journal of eating disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Prevalence of Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID) in children with and without food allergy.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Christine E Cooper-VinceDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5043-6342
Chika NwakaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Kamryn T EddyEating Disorders Clinical and Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1586-0930
Madhusmita MisraDivision of Pediatric Endocrinology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9405-2981
Natalia A HadawayEating Disorders Clinical and Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Kendra R BeckerEating Disorders Clinical and Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8946-9977
Elizabeth A LawsonNeuroendocrine Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Massachusetts, USA.
Lucy CookeFeeding and Eating Disorders Service, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Rachel Bryant-WaughSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7449-6059
Jennifer J ThomasEating Disorders Clinical and Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2601-581X
Nadia MicaliDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Harvard University · USUniversity of Geneva · CHMassachusetts General Hospital · USGreat Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust · GBKing's College - North Carolina · US

Funding

Neurobiological and Behavioral Risk Mechanisms of Youth Avoidant/Restrictive Eating TrajectoriesR01MH108595 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI LAWSON, ELIZABETH AUSTEN, MICALI, NADIA · 2016 to 2020
$3.4M
Neurobiology of avoidant/restrictive eating in youthK24MH120568 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI LAWSON, ELIZABETH AUSTEN · 2019 to 2023
$961k
NIMH NIH HHS K24 MH120568NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH108595
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThere is a paucity of validated diagnostic interviews for avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) to aid identification and classification of cases for both clinical and research purposes. To evaluate the factor structure, construct validity, and criterion validity of the Pica ARFID and Rumination Disorder Interview (PARDI; ARFID module), we administered the PARDI to 129 children and adolescents ages 9-23 years (M = 16.1) with ARFID (n = 84), subclinical ARFID (n = 11), and healthy controls (n = 34).

methodWe used exploratory factor analysis to examine the factor structure of the PARDI in children, adolescents, and young adults with an ARFID diagnosis, the Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance and Spearman correlations to test the construct validity of the measure, and non-parametric receiver operating characteristic curves to evaluate the criterion validity of the PARDI.

resultsExploratory factor analysis yielded a 3-factor structure: (1) concern about aversive consequences of eating, (2) low appetite/low interest in food, and (3) sensory sensitivity. Participants with ARFID demonstrated significantly higher levels of sensory sensitivity, low appetite/low-food interest, and concern about aversive consequences of eating symptoms relative to control participants. The construct validity for each PARDI subscale was supported and clinical cutoffs for the low appetite/low interest in food (1.1) and sensory sensitivity subscales (0.6) were established. DISCUSSION: These data present evidence for the factor structure and validity of the PARDI diagnostic interview for diagnosing ARFID in children, adolescents, and young adults, supporting the use of this tool to facilitate ARFID clinical assessment and research. PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE: Due to the paucity of validated diagnostic interviews for avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID), we evaluated the factor structure and validity of the Pica ARFID and Rumination Disorder Interview (ARFID module). Findings suggest that the interview assesses 3 components of ARFID: concern about aversive consequences of eating, low-appetite, and sensory sensitivity, and that clinical threshold scores on the latter two subscales can be used to advance ARFID assessment.

Indexed as

Avoidant Restrictive Food Intake DisorderFeeding and Eating DisordersRumination SyndromeAdolescentAdultChildEatingHumansPicaRetrospective StudiesYoung Adultassessmentavoidant/restrictive food intake disorderdiagnosisfactor analysisfeeding and eating disordersPicareceiver operating characteristicrumination disorder interviewyouth

Identifiers

PMID36324295
PMCPMC9641545
OpenAlexW4293067226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.