Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36324291›Full record

ReviewPhysiological reports2022

Physiological impact of load carriage exercise: Current understanding and future research directions.

Mark A Faghy, Ren-Jay Shei, Nicola C D Armstrong, Mark White, Mitch Lomax

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Physiological reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
13.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. 25 years of military load carriage.Experimental physiology · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Rehabilitating Soldiers for Load Carriage Tasks: An International Perspective.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Load carriage physiology in normoxia and hypoxia.European journal of applied physiology · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Mark A FaghyBiomedical Research Theme, School of Human Sciences, University of Derby, Derby, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8163-7032
Ren-Jay SheiDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Nicola C D ArmstrongDefence Science and Technology Laboratory, Salisbury, UK.
Mark WhiteRocky Mountain University of Health Professions, Provo, Utah, USA.
Mitch LomaxExtreme Environments Laboratory, School of Sport, Health and Exercise Science, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1381-0398
Defence Science and Technology Laboratory · GBRocky Mountain University of Health Professions · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Derby · GBUniversity of Portsmouth · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Load carriage (LC) refers to the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) and/or load-bearing apparatus that is mostly worn over the thoracic cavity. A commonplace task across various physically demanding occupational groups, the mass being carried during LC duties can approach the wearer's body mass. When compared to unloaded exercise, LC imposes additional physiological stress that negatively impacts the respiratory system by restricting chest wall movement and altering ventilatory mechanics as well as circulatory responses. Consequently, LC activities accelerate the development of fatigue in the respiratory muscles and reduce exercise performance in occupational tasks. Therefore, understanding the implications of LC and the effects specific factors have on physiological capacities during LC activity are important to the implementation of effective mitigation strategies to ameliorate the detrimental effects of thoracic LC. Accordingly, this review highlights the current physiological understanding of LC activities and outlines the knowledge and efficacy of current interventions and research that have attempted to improve LC performance, whilst also highlighting pertinent knowledge gaps that must be explored via future research activities.

Indexed as

ExerciseRespiratory MusclesRespirationThoraxWeight-Bearingbackpackergonomicsexercise toleranceload carriage, occupational physiologymilitary physiologyrespiratory musclesweighted exercise, personal protective equipment

Identifiers

PMID36324291
PMCPMC9630762
OpenAlexW4307994187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.