ArticlePhysiological reports2022
Impact of the downstream myocardial mass on values of coronary microvascular resistance.
Article in Physiological reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intracoronary physiological indices for coronary microvascular dysfunction: from concept to clinical application.Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics · 2026Review
- Impact of the downstream myocardial mass on values of coronary microvascular resistance.Physiological reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The assessment of hyperemic microvascular resistance (HMR) may be dependent on the assessment location in the coronary artery and the amount of partial myocardial mass (PMM) distal to the assessment locations. The aim of this study was to investigate the differences in HMR values between the distal and proximal sites in the same coronary arteries as well as the relationship between HMR and PMM. Twenty-nine vessels from 26 patients who had undergone intracoronary physiological assessments including Doppler flow velocity at the distal third part and the proximal third part in the same vessels were assessed. The mean values of HMR and PMM at the distal sites were 2.08 ± 0.75 mmHg/cm/sec and 22.2 ± 10.4 g, respectively. At the proximal sites, the values of HMR and PMM were 1.19 ± 0.33 mmHg/cm/sec and 59.9 ± 18.3 g, respectively. All HMR values at the distal sites were significantly higher than those at the proximal sites (p < 0.001). Smaller PMM at the distal sites was significantly associated with higher HMR (r = -0.544, p = 0.002) and was the strongest factor affecting the HMR values (p = 0.009), while this relationship was not observed at the proximal sites (r = -0.262, p = 0.17). The impact of PMM on HMR was diminished at assessment locations where PMM was greater than 35 g. In conclusion, a small amount of downstream myocardial mass could be related to high HMR values. The assessment location around the proximal coronary artery with over 35 g of myocardium would be appropriate to assess HMR because it minimizes the influence of the assessment location.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.