Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36324249›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2023

Development and pilot testing of PROACTIVE: A pediatric onco-critical care capacity and quality assessment tool for resource-limited settings.

Anita V Arias, Firas M Sakaan, Maria Puerto-Torres, Zebin Al Zebin, Parthasarathi Bhattacharyya, Adolfo Cardenas, Sanjeeva Gunasekera, Joyce Kambugu, Kirill Kirgizov, Jaime Libes and 11 more

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Anita V AriasDivision of Critical Care, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7568-5284
Firas M SakaanDepartment of Global Pediatric Medicine, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Maria Puerto-TorresDepartment of Global Pediatric Medicine, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Zebin Al ZebinPediatric Hematology and Oncology, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan.
Parthasarathi BhattacharyyaDepartment of Pediatric Oncology Critical Care, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, India.
Adolfo CardenasDepartment of Global Pediatric Medicine, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Sanjeeva GunasekeraDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, National Cancer Institute Sri Lanka, Maharagama, Sri Lanka.ORCID 0000-0002-4043-559X
Joyce KambuguDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, Uganda Cancer Institute, Kampala, Uganda.
Kirill KirgizovSt. Jude Global, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Jaime LibesDepartment of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Peoria, Illinois, USA.
Angelica MartinezPediatric Hemato-Oncology Unit, Hospital General de Tijuana, Tijuana, Baja California, Mexico.
Nune V MatinyanSt. Jude Global, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Alejandra MendezPediatric Critical Care, Unidad Nacional de Oncología Pediátrica (UNOP), Guatemala City, Guatemala.
Janet MiddlekauffDepartment of Global Pediatric Medicine, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Katie R NielsenDivision of Pediatric Critical Care, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6127-7167
Andrew PappasDepartment of Global Pediatric Medicine, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Hong RenDepartment of Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, Shanghai, China.
Rana Sharara-ChamiDepartment of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Silvio F TorresPediatric Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Universitario Austral, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Jennifer McArthurDivision of Critical Care, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Asya AgulnikDivision of Critical Care, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8932-8181

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNearly 90% children with cancer reside in low- and middle-income countries, which face multiple challenges delivering high-quality pediatric onco-critical care (POCC). We recently identified POCC quality and capacity indicators for PROACTIVE (PediatRic Oncology cApaCity assessment Tool for IntensiVe carE), a tool that evaluates strengths and limitations in POCC services. This study describes pilot testing of PROACTIVE, development of center-specific reports, and identification of common POCC challenges.

methodsThe original 119 consensus-derived PROACTIVE indicators were converted into 182 questions divided between 2 electronic surveys for intensivists and oncologists managing critically ill pediatric cancer patients. Alpha-testing was conducted to confirm face-validity with four pediatric intensivists. Eleven centers representing diverse geographic regions, income levels, and POCC services conducted beta-testing to evaluate usability, feasibility, and applicability of PROACTIVE. Centers' responses were scored and indicators with mean scores ≤75% in availability/performance were classified as common POCC challenges.

resultsAlpha-testing ensured face-validity and beta-testing demonstrated feasibility and usability of PROACTIVE (October 2020-June 2021). Twenty-two surveys (response rate 99.4%) were used to develop center-specific reports. Adjustments to PROACTIVE were made based on focus group feedback and surveys, resulting in 200 questions. Aggregated data across centers identified common POCC challenges: (1) lack of pediatric intensivists, (2) absence of abstinence and withdrawal symptoms monitoring, (3) shortage of supportive care resources, and (4) limited POCC training for physicians and nurses.

conclusionsPROACTIVE is a feasible and contextually appropriate tool to help clinicians and organizations identify challenges in POCC services across a wide range of resource-levels. Widespread use of PROACTIVE can help prioritize and develop tailored interventions to strengthen POCC services and outcomes globally.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsResource-Limited SettingsChildCritical CareHumansQuality of Health CareSurveys and Questionnairescritical care medicineglobal healthhealth quality of carepediatric cancerquality improvement

Identifiers

PMID36324249
PMCPMC10028058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read69
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.