Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36324119›Full record

SynthesisJournal of translational medicine2022

The effects of probiotic administration on patients with prediabetes: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Ya Li, You Wu, Lili Wu, Lingling Qin, Tonghua Liu

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Research Progress in the Relationship between Intestinal Flora and Diabetes Mellitus.Endocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. The Influence of Gut Microbial Species on Diabetes Mellitus.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Ya LiKey Laboratory of Health Cultivation of the Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, 100029, Beijing, China.
You WuKey Laboratory of Health Cultivation of the Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, 100029, Beijing, China.
Lili WuKey Laboratory of Health Cultivation of the Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, 100029, Beijing, China.
Lingling QinKey Laboratory of Health Cultivation of the Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, 100029, Beijing, China.
Tonghua LiuKey Laboratory of Health Cultivation of the Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, 100029, Beijing, China. thliu@vip.163.com.ORCID 0000-0001-7015-5348
Beijing University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis paper aimed to examine the effects of probiotics on eight factors in the prediabetic population by meta-analysis, namely, fasting blood glucose (FBG), glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI), total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and the mechanisms of action are summarized from the existing studies.

methodsSeven databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, SinoMed, CNKI, and Wanfang Med) were searched until March 2022. Review Manager 5.4 was used for meta-analysis. The data were analysed using weighted mean differences (WMDs) or standardized mean differences (SMDs) under a fixed effect model to observe the efficacy of probiotic supplementation on the included indicators.

resultsSeven publications with a total of 460 patients were included. According to the meta-analysis, probiotics were able to significantly decrease the levels of HbA1c (WMD, -0.07; 95% CI -0.11, -0.03; P = 0.001), QUICKI (WMD, 0.01; 95% CI 0.00, 0.02; P = 0.04), TC (SMD, -0.28; 95% CI -0.53, -0.22; P = 0.03), TG (SMD, -0.26; 95% CI -0.52, -0.01; P = 0.04), and LDL-C (WMD, -8.94; 95% CI -14.91, -2.97; P = 0.003) compared to levels in the placebo group. The effects on FBG (WMD, -0.53; 95% CI -2.31, 1.25; P = 0.56), HOMA-IR (WMD, -0.21; 95% CI -0.45, 0.04; P = 0.10), and HDL-C (WMD, 2.05; 95% CI -0.28, 4.38; P = 0.08) were not different from those of the placebo group.

conclusionThe present study clearly indicated that probiotics may fulfil an important role in the regulation of HbA1c, QUICKI, TC, TG and LDL-C in patients with prediabetes. In addition, based on existing studies, we concluded that probiotics may regulate blood glucose homeostasis in a variety of ways.

trial registrationThis meta-analysis has been registered at PROSPERO with ID: CRD42022321995.

Indexed as

Prediabetic StateProbioticsBlood GlucoseCholesterol, HDLCholesterol, LDLGlycated HemoglobinHumansTriglyceridesBlood GlucoseCholesterol, HDLCholesterol, LDLGlycated HemoglobinTriglyceridesMeta-analysisPrediabetesProbioticsRandom control trialsSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID36324119
PMCPMC9632036
OpenAlexW4307922282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.