Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36324101›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2022

The decisional balance, attitudes, and practice behaviors, its predicting factors, and related experiences of advance care planning in Taiwanese patients with advanced cancer.

Yueh-Chun Chen, Hsiang-Ping Huang, Tao-Hsin Tung, Ming-Yang Lee, Randal D Beaton, Yung-Chang Lin, Sui-Whi Jane

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Yueh-Chun Chen *Department of Nursing, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chia-Yi Christian Hospital, Chia-Yi, Taiwan.
Hsiang-Ping Huang *Department of Nursing, Chang Gung University of Science and Technology, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.
Tao-Hsin TungEvidence-based Medicine Center, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Linhai, Zhejiang, China.
Ming-Yang LeeDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chia-Yi Christian Hospital, Chia-Yi, Taiwan.
Randal D BeatonPsychosocial & Community Health and Health Services, Schools of Nursing and Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Yung-Chang Lin *Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Lin-Ko, Taiwan.
Sui-Whi Jane *Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Lin-Ko, Taiwan. swjane@gw.cgust.edu.tw.
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital · TWChia-Yi Christian Hospital · TWChang Gung University of Science and Technology · TWUniversity of Washington · USWenzhou Medical University · CN

Funding

Administration Center of Medical Research Department, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chia-Yi Christian Hospital, Taiwan R108-036
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with advanced cancer are prone to experience burdensome physical, psychological, and financial consequences. Healthcare providers may not fully appreciate advanced cancer patients' medical care autonomy, such as at that emboded by Advance Care Planning (ACP), and by doing so may compromise their quality of end-of-life (EOL). Hence, it is essential for healthcare providers to effectively assess and communicate with patients' regarding their medical decisions before their patients are incapacitated by their disease progression. The purpose of this investigation was to describe the decisional balance, attitudes, and practice behaviors of ACP and its predictors of ACP-related experiences in Taiwanese patients with advanced cancer.

methodsThis cross-sectional, descriptive study employed a mixed-methodsquantitative and qualitative design with a sample of 166 patients that were purposely recruited from in-patient oncology units at a regional teaching hospital in southern Taiwan. Study data consisted of patient replies to a 34-item self-report tool, Decisional Balance, Attitudes, Practice Behaviors of ACP (DAP-ACP) and 4 semi-structured questions.

resultFindings indicated that, in general, study participants exhibited favorable ACP-decisional balance and positive ACP-attitudes & practice behaviors. The results also indicated that gender, educational level, and cancer diagnosis were associated with significant differences on the "ACP-decisional balance" and "ACP-attitudes" scales. In addition, our findings documented that the participants' gender and educational level were significant predictors of both ACP-decisional balance and ACP-attitudes. Furthermore the participants' ACP-practice behaviors were predicted by ACP-decisional balance, but not with their ACP-attitudes. The qualitative analysis of the semi-structured questions identified six themes in responses to current medical decision making (e.g., compliance with physician instructions, family engagement in treatment decision-making); and eight themes pertaining to future ACP-related concerns were identified (e.g., family conflict, effectiveness of time-limited trials).

conclusionTo promote patients' engagement in ACP, the healthcare professional need to assess and advocate patients' concerns or attitudes regarding ACP in a timely manner. In addition, factors or concerns that might influence patients' responses to ACP derived from both the quantitative and qualitative findings of this current study need to be considered especially in initiating the dialogue regarding ACP with patients with advanced cancer.

trial registrationNo. CYCH 2,019,072, Date of registration 5 Dec 2019.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningNeoplasmsPhysiciansAttitudeCross-Sectional StudiesHumansAdvance care planningAdvanced cancerAttitudeDecisional balancePractice behaviorsQualitative responses

Identifiers

PMID36324101
PMCPMC9628122
OpenAlexW4308142818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.