Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36324088›Full record

ArticleBMC neurology2022

Study protocol of transcranial electrical stimulation at alpha frequency applied during rehabilitation: A randomized controlled trial in chronic stroke patients with visuospatial neglect.

Marij Middag-van Spanje, Teresa Schuhmann, Tanja Nijboer, Olof van der Werf, Alexander T Sack, Caroline van Heugten

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05466487 (Transcranial Alternating Stimulation in Rehabilitation), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05466487 nacompletednot on this map

Transcranial Alternating Stimulation in Rehabilitation: a Randomized Controlled Trial in Chronic Stroke Patients With Visuospatial Neglect

TypeinterventionalSponsorMaastricht UniversityRan2020 to 2023Enrolled22ConditionsSpatial NeglectArmsTranscranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS), Visual Scanning Training (VST)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marij Middag-van SpanjeSection Brain Stimulation and Cognition, Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. Marij.middag@maastrichtuniversity.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1189-5335
Teresa SchuhmannSection Brain Stimulation and Cognition, Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Tanja NijboerDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Olof van der WerfSection Brain Stimulation and Cognition, Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Alexander T SackSection Brain Stimulation and Cognition, Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Caroline van HeugtenLimburg Brain Injury Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Maastricht University · NLUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA frequent post stroke disorder in lateralized attention is visuospatial neglect (VSN). As VSN has a strong negative impact on recovery in general and independence during daily life, optimal treatment is deemed urgent. Next to traditional stroke treatment, non-invasive brain stimulation offers the potential to facilitate stroke recovery as a complementary approach. In the present study, visual scanning training (VST; the current conventional treatment) will be combined with transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) to evaluate the additive effects of repeated sessions of tACS in combination with six-weeks VST rehabilitation.

methodsIn this double-blind randomized placebo-controlled intervention study (RCT), we will compare the effects of active tACS plus VST to sham (placebo) tACS plus VST, both encompassing 18 VST training sessions, 40 minutes each, during 6 weeks. Chronic stroke patients with VSN (> 6 months post-stroke onset) are considered eligible for study participation. In total 22 patients are needed for the study. The primary outcome is change in performance on a cancellation task. Secondary outcomes are changes in performance on a visual detection task, two line bisection tasks, and three measures to assess changes in activities of daily living. Assessment is at baseline, directly after the first and ninth training session, after the last training session (post training), and 1 week and 3 months after termination of the training (follow-up). DISCUSSION: If effective, a tACS-VST rehabilitation program could be implemented as a treatment option for VSN.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov ; registration number: NCT05466487; registration date: July 18, 2022 retrospectively registered; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05466487.

Indexed as

Perceptual DisordersStrokeStroke RehabilitationTranscranial Direct Current StimulationActivities of Daily LivingBrain Damage, ChronicHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeVisual PerceptionActivities of daily livingRandomized controlled trialStrokeTranscranial alternating current stimulationTranscranial electrical stimulationVisual scanning trainingVisuospatial neglect

Identifiers

PMID36324088
PMCPMC9628038
OpenAlexW4308139577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.