Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36324004›Full record

ArticleNeurocritical care2023

Teleneurocritical Care for Patients with Large Vessel Occlusive Ischemic Stroke Treated by Thrombectomy.

Nick M Murray, Scott Marshall, Robert Hoesch, Kyle Hobbs, Shawn Smith, Dean Roller, Katherine Thomas, Kevin Meier, Adrian Puttgen

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurocritical care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nick M MurrayDepartment of Neurology, Intermountain Medical Center, 5121 Cottonwood Street, Murray, UT, 84107, USA. nickmmurray@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3861-0958
Scott MarshallDepartment of Neurology, Intermountain Medical Center, 5121 Cottonwood Street, Murray, UT, 84107, USA.
Robert HoeschDepartment of Neurology, Intermountain Medical Center, 5121 Cottonwood Street, Murray, UT, 84107, USA.
Kyle HobbsDepartment of Neurology, Intermountain Medical Center, 5121 Cottonwood Street, Murray, UT, 84107, USA.
Shawn SmithDepartment of Neurology, Intermountain Medical Center, 5121 Cottonwood Street, Murray, UT, 84107, USA.
Dean RollerDepartment of Neurology, Intermountain Medical Center, 5121 Cottonwood Street, Murray, UT, 84107, USA.
Katherine ThomasDepartment of Neurology, Intermountain Medical Center, 5121 Cottonwood Street, Murray, UT, 84107, USA.
Kevin MeierDepartment of Neurology, Intermountain Medical Center, 5121 Cottonwood Street, Murray, UT, 84107, USA.
Adrian PuttgenDepartment of Neurology, Intermountain Medical Center, 5121 Cottonwood Street, Murray, UT, 84107, USA.
Cotton (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTeleneurocritical care (TNCC) provides 24/7 virtual treatment of patients with neurological disease in the emergency department or intensive care unit. However, it is not known if TNCC is safe, effective, or associated with similar outcomes compared with in-person neurocritical care. We aim to determine the effect of daily inpatient consults from TNCC on the outcomes of patients with large vessel occlusive acute ischemic stroke treated by thrombectomy.

methodsA multicenter, retrospective cohort of consecutive patients ≥ 18 years old with acute ischemic stroke from a large vessel occlusion treated by thrombectomy were identified from 2018 to 2021 within a telehealth network of an integrated not-for-profit health care system in the United States. The primary end point was good functional outcome, i.e., modified Rankin Scale 0-3, at the time of hospital discharge in patients receiving in-person neurocritical care versus TNCC.

resultsA total of 437 patients met inclusion criteria, 226 at the in-person hospital (median age 67, 53% women) and 211 at the two TNCC hospitals (median age 74, 49% women). The rate of successful endovascular therapy (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score 2b-3) was not different among hospitals. Good functional outcome at discharge was similar between in-person neurocritical care and TNCC (in-person 31.4% vs. TNCC 33.5%, odds ratio 0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.6-1.3; p = 0.64). Only National Institutes of Health stroke scale and age were multivariable predictors of outcome. There were no differences in mortality (9.3% vs. 13.2%, p = 0.19), intensive care unit length of stay (2.1 vs. 1.9 days, p = 0.39), or rate of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (6.8% vs. 6.6%, p = 0.47) between in-person neurocritical care and TNCC.

conclusionsTeleneurocritical care allows for equivalent favorable functional outcomes compared with in-person neurocritical care for patients with acute large vessel ischemic stroke receiving thrombectomy. The standardized protocols used by TNCC in this study, specifically the comprehensive 24/7 treatment of patients in the intensive care unit for the length of their stay, may be relevant for other health systems with limited in-person resources; however, additional study is required.

Indexed as

Arterial Occlusive DiseasesBrain IschemiaEndovascular ProceduresIschemic StrokeStrokeAdolescentAgedFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesThrombectomyTreatment OutcomeIschemic strokeLarge vessel occlusionNeurocritical careTelemedicineTeleneurocritical careTeleNeuroICUVirtual critical care

Identifiers

PMID36324004
OpenAlexW4308058139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.