Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36323803›Full record

ReviewClinical oral investigations2023

Synergy between artificial intelligence and precision medicine for computer-assisted oral and maxillofacial surgical planning.

Sohaib Shujaat, Marryam Riaz, Reinhilde Jacobs

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical oral investigations, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07523815 (Assessment of the Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence Assisted Workflow Versus Conventional Workflow in Computer Guided Implant Placement), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07523815 phase4recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Assessment of the Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence Assisted Workflow Versus Conventional Workflow in Computer Guided Implant Placement: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorSandra Moussa Botros El TarziRan2026 to 2026Enrolled20ConditionsPartially Edentulous MandibleArmsAI assisted implant placement, Conventional computer guided implant placement
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Beyond the Drill: Can Digital Gadgets Redefine the Future of Dental Education?European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Electrical Stimulation Therapy - Dedicated to the Perfect Plastic Repair.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sohaib ShujaatDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. sohaib.shujaat941@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6250-2650
Marryam RiazDepartment of Physiology, Azra Naheed Dental College, Superior University, Lahore, Pakistan.
Reinhilde JacobsOMFS IMPATH Research Group, Department of Imaging & Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven & Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this review was to investigate the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in maxillofacial computer-assisted surgical planning (CASP) workflows with the discussion of limitations and possible future directions. MATERIALS AND

methodsAn in-depth search of the literature was undertaken to review articles concerned with the application of AI for segmentation, multimodal image registration, virtual surgical planning (VSP), and three-dimensional (3D) printing steps of the maxillofacial CASP workflows.

resultsThe existing AI models were trained to address individual steps of CASP, and no single intelligent workflow was found encompassing all steps of the planning process. Segmentation of dentomaxillofacial tissue from computed tomography (CT)/cone-beam CT imaging was the most commonly explored area which could be applicable in a clinical setting. Nevertheless, a lack of generalizability was the main issue, as the majority of models were trained with the data derived from a single device and imaging protocol which might not offer similar performance when considering other devices. In relation to registration, VSP and 3D printing, the presence of inadequate heterogeneous data limits the automatization of these tasks.

conclusionThe synergy between AI and CASP workflows has the potential to improve the planning precision and efficacy. However, there is a need for future studies with big data before the emergent technology finds application in a real clinical setting. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The implementation of AI models in maxillofacial CASP workflows could minimize a surgeon's workload and increase efficiency and consistency of the planning process, meanwhile enhancing the patient-specific predictability.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceSurgery, Computer-AssistedComputersHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalPrecision MedicineArtificial intelligenceComputer-assisted surgeryCone-beam computed tomographyReconstructive surgical procedures

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.