Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36323775›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Instantaneous 4D micro-particle image velocimetry (µPIV) via multifocal microscopy (MUM).

M G R Guastamacchia, R Xue, K Madi, W T E Pitkeathly, P D Lee, S E D Webb, S H Cartmell, P A Dalgarno

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

M G R GuastamacchiaEPSRC Centre for Doctoral Training in Applied Photonics, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK.
R XueDepartment of Materials, School of Natural Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
K MadiDepartment of Materials, School of Natural Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
W T E PitkeathlyInstitute of Biological Chemistry, Biophysics and Bioengineering, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK.
P D LeeDepartment of Materials, School of Natural Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
S E D WebbScience and Technology Facilities Council, Research Complex at Harwell, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Harwell, UK.
S H CartmellDepartment of Materials, School of Natural Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
P A DalgarnoInstitute of Biological Chemistry, Biophysics and Bioengineering, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK. p.a.dalgarno@hw.ac.uk.
University of Manchester · GBHeriot-Watt University · GBBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council · GBScience and Technology Facilities Council · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/F013892/2Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/K016865/1Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/G037523/1Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/I02249X/1Medical Research Council MR/R025673/1Rosetrees Trust M484
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multifocal microscopy (MUM), a technique to capture multiple fields of view (FOVs) from distinct axial planes simultaneously and on one camera, was used to perform micro-particle image velocimetry (µPIV) to reconstruct velocity and shear stress fields imposed by a liquid flowing around a cell. A diffraction based multifocal relay was used to capture images from three different planes with 630 nm axial spacing from which the axial positions of the flow-tracing particles were calculated using the image sharpness metric. It was shown that MUM can achieve an accuracy on the calculated velocity of around (0.52 ± 0.19) µm/s. Using fixed cells, MUM imaged the flow perturbations at sub-cellular level, which showed characteristics similar to those observed in the literature. Using live cells as an exemplar, MUM observed the effect of changing cell morphology on the local flow during perfusion. Compared to standard confocal laser scanning microscope, MUM offers a clear advantage in acquisition speed for µPIV (over 300 times faster). This is an important characteristic for rapidly evolving biological systems where there is the necessity to monitor in real time entire volumes to correlate the sample responses to the external forces.

Indexed as

RheologyMicroscopy, ConfocalStress, Mechanical

Identifiers

PMID36323775
PMCPMC9630545
OpenAlexW4308147076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.