ArticleScientific reports2022
The impact of Hounsfield unit-related variables on percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcomes.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus multiple-tract mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for moderate-to-complex kidney stones: a propensity score-matched retrospective study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Recognizing uric acid type of urinary stones by deep learning.Urolithiasis · 2025Article
- From conventional scores to explainable AI: a six-method comparative framework for failure prediction in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.World journal of urology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We aimed to identify the association between Hounsfield Unit(HU)-related variables and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) outcomes. We enrolled patients with single renal stones (1-3 cm) who underwent single-tract PCNL between January 2014 and October 2019. Demographics and stone characteristics were retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative computerized tomography (CT) and follow-up CT within at least 3 months after PCNL were included in this analysis. Stone-free status was defined as residual stone measuring ≤ 2 mm within 3 months postoperatively. HU and cross-sectional area (CSA) were measured using the free-draw technique. We analyzed HU-related variables using logistic regression model for outcomes. Altogether, 188 out of 683 patients met the inclusion criteria. The stone-free rate (SFR) was 79.2%. There were no significant differences in age, sex, BMI, ASA class, laterality, pre-op shockwave lithotripsy, stone size, stone burden, skin-to-stone distance, and HU between the stone-free and remnant groups. CSA and HU/CSA in the stone-free and remnant groups were 94.5 ± 46.1 and 128.3 ± 98.5 (p = 0.043) and 10.1 ± 5.6 and 7.3 ± 3.4 (p = 0.001), respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that pelvis, ureteropelvic junction stones, and HU/CSA were independent predictors of SFR. HU did not affect PCNL outcomes. We believe that HU/CSA could be used for determining stone treatment plans and predicting outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.