Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36323687›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Mental health in pregnant individuals during the COVID-19 pandemic based on a Swiss online survey.

Guillaume Favre, Cléa Kunz, Simone Schwank, Ho-Fung Chung, Anda Petronela Radan, Luigi Raio, Mihaela Fluri, Ursula Winterfeld, David Baud, Léo Pomar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A Systematic Review on the Mental Health Status of Patients Infected With Monkeypox Virus.Journal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 6 countries.

Guillaume FavreMaterno-Fetal and Obstetrics Research Unit, Department Woman-Mother-Child, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland. guillaume.favre@chuv.ch.
Cléa KunzMaterno-Fetal and Obstetrics Research Unit, Department Woman-Mother-Child, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Simone SchwankDepartment of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ho-Fung ChungDepartment of Psychology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Anda Petronela RadanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Bern and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Luigi RaioDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Bern and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Mihaela FluriDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Bern and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Ursula WinterfeldSwiss Teratogen Information Service, Clinical Pharmacology Service, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
David BaudMaterno-Fetal and Obstetrics Research Unit, Department Woman-Mother-Child, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Léo PomarMaterno-Fetal and Obstetrics Research Unit, Department Woman-Mother-Child, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
University of Lausanne · CHUniversity Hospital of Bern · CHChinese University of Hong Kong · CNHES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland · CHNew York Psychoanalytic Society and Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of our study was to evaluate the mental health of pregnant individuals during the early COVID-19 pandemic and the potential factors associated. A Swiss online survey was proposed to individuals who gave birth during the pandemic period from March 2020. The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 questions (GAD-7), and Impact Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) were evaluated and used to defined mental health impairment as a composite outcome. From October, 2020 to February, 2021, 736 participants responded. The anxiety GAD-7 score was moderate in 9.6% and severe in 2.0%. The EPDS was moderate in 21.5% and severe in 32.9%. The IES-R was moderate in 10.3% and severe in 3.9%. Mental health impairment was reported in 37.0%. The association between the risk of mental health impairment and foreign nationality was significant (OR = 1.48; 95%CI [1.06-2.05]) as well as fetal and pregnancy worries because of coronavirus (OR = 1.46; 95% CI [1.08-1.98]) and 1.65; 95% CI [1.22-2.24]). Adjusted ORs were significant for foreign nationality (aOR = 1.51; 95%CI [1.07-2.13]) and pregnancy worries because of coronavirus (aOR = 1.62; 95%CI [1.10-2.40]). Pregnant people and especially foreign national have a high risk of mental health impairment during the pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsAnxietyDepressionEthnicityFemaleHumansMental HealthPregnancySARS-CoV-2Switzerland

Identifiers

PMID36323687
PMCPMC9628478
OpenAlexW4308147272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.