Trial reportRMD open2022
Biomarkers to predict risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving tofacitinib or tumour necrosis factor inhibitors.
Trial report in RMD open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02092467 (PHASE 3B/4 RANDOMIZED SAFETY ENDPOINT STUDY OF 2 DOSES OF TOFACITINIB IN COMPARISON TO A TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Phase 3b/4 randomized safety endpoint study of 2 doses of tofacitinib in comparison to a tumor necrosis factor (tnf) inhibitor in subjects with rheumatoid arthritis
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cardiovascular safety of Janus kinase inhibitors in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Annals of medicine · 2025Pooled it
- A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing outcomes following total knee arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis versus for osteoarthritis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2023Pooled it
- Trial
- Persistence Among Biologic/JAKi-Naive Medicare Beneficiaries with RA Initiating Synthetic DMARDs.Rheumatology and therapy · 2026Article
- Observational
- Positive and Negative Cardiovascular Effects of JAK Inhibitors in Inflammation.ACR open rheumatology · 2026Review
- Proteomic Biomarkers in VTE: From Discovery to Clinical Translation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Advancing IBD Management: A Literature Review on the Role of Non-Invasive Blood-Based Biomarkers in Predicting and Assessing Pharmacodynamic Response to Treatment.Clinical and translational science · 2026Review
- Effect of Tofacitinib on Hemostasis in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis: A Comparative Ex Vivo Study.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis: update for the practising clinician.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2024Review
- Managing Cardiovascular and Cancer Risk Associated with JAK Inhibitors.Drug safety · 2023Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveIn the ORAL (Oral Rheumatoid Arthritis triaL) Surveillance study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis aged ≥50 years with ≥1 additional cardiovascular risk factor, incidence of pulmonary embolism was higher with tofacitinib 10 mg two times per day than with tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi). This exploratory post hoc analysis examined whether biomarkers explained the associations of tofacitinib versus TNFi with venous thromboembolism (VTE).
methodsORAL Surveillance was a prospective, open-label, event-driven, non-inferiority, postauthorisation safety study. Patients were randomised 1:1:1 to receive tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg two times per day or a TNFi. For this analysis, 294 soluble, proteomic, genetic and antibody biomarkers (of which 79 had a known role in inflammation, coagulation, vascular biology or Janus kinase signalling) were quantified in serum collected at baseline, month 12 and study end.
resultsOverall, 4362 patients were randomised and treated. The exploratory biomarker data set included 285 patients (57 VTE cases; 228 matched controls). D-dimer was quantified in 3732 patients (54 VTE cases; 3678 controls). No biomarker demonstrated a clear mechanistic association with the increased risk of VTE for tofacitinib versus TNFi. Month 12 D-dimer levels were positively associated with risk of a subsequent VTE within the tofacitinib 5 mg and 10 mg two times per day arms.
conclusionsOverall, this post hoc analysis did not identify biomarkers that explained the increased VTE risk for tofacitinib versus TNFi. Individual VTE risk should be considered when making decisions about initiation or maintenance of tofacitinib treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02092467; ClinicalTrials.gov.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.