Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36323490›Full record

Trial reportRMD open2022

Biomarkers to predict risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving tofacitinib or tumour necrosis factor inhibitors.

Jeffrey I Weitz, Zoltán Szekanecz, Christina Charles-Schoeman, Ivana Vranic, Burak Sahin, Sara A Paciga, Zhenyu Wang, Craig Hyde, David A Martin

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in RMD open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02092467 (PHASE 3B/4 RANDOMIZED SAFETY ENDPOINT STUDY OF 2 DOSES OF TOFACITINIB IN COMPARISON TO A TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02092467 phase4completednot on this map

Phase 3b/4 randomized safety endpoint study of 2 doses of tofacitinib in comparison to a tumor necrosis factor (tnf) inhibitor in subjects with rheumatoid arthritis

TypeinterventionalSponsorPfizerRan2014 to 2020Enrolled4,372ConditionsArthritis, RheumatoidArmstofacitinib, adalimumab, etanercept
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Jeffrey I WeitzMcMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1092-7550
Zoltán SzekaneczDivision of Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-7794-6844
Christina Charles-SchoemanDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1768-7019
Ivana VranicGlobal Safety, Pfizer Ltd, Tadworth, UK.
Burak SahinImmunology & Inflammation Medical Affairs, Pfizer Inc, Istanbul, Turkey burak.sahin@pfizer.com.
Sara A PacigaBiostatistics, Pfizer Inc, Groton, Connecticut, USA.
Zhenyu WangImmunology & Inflammation Research, Pfizer Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Craig HydeBiostatistics, Pfizer Inc, Groton, Connecticut, USA.
David A MartinImmunology & Inflammation Research, Pfizer Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Pfizer (United States) · USPfizer (United Kingdom) · GBThrombosis and Atherosclerosis Research Institute · CAUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Debrecen · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn the ORAL (Oral Rheumatoid Arthritis triaL) Surveillance study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis aged ≥50 years with ≥1 additional cardiovascular risk factor, incidence of pulmonary embolism was higher with tofacitinib 10 mg two times per day than with tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi). This exploratory post hoc analysis examined whether biomarkers explained the associations of tofacitinib versus TNFi with venous thromboembolism (VTE).

methodsORAL Surveillance was a prospective, open-label, event-driven, non-inferiority, postauthorisation safety study. Patients were randomised 1:1:1 to receive tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg two times per day or a TNFi. For this analysis, 294 soluble, proteomic, genetic and antibody biomarkers (of which 79 had a known role in inflammation, coagulation, vascular biology or Janus kinase signalling) were quantified in serum collected at baseline, month 12 and study end.

resultsOverall, 4362 patients were randomised and treated. The exploratory biomarker data set included 285 patients (57 VTE cases; 228 matched controls). D-dimer was quantified in 3732 patients (54 VTE cases; 3678 controls). No biomarker demonstrated a clear mechanistic association with the increased risk of VTE for tofacitinib versus TNFi. Month 12 D-dimer levels were positively associated with risk of a subsequent VTE within the tofacitinib 5 mg and 10 mg two times per day arms.

conclusionsOverall, this post hoc analysis did not identify biomarkers that explained the increased VTE risk for tofacitinib versus TNFi. Individual VTE risk should be considered when making decisions about initiation or maintenance of tofacitinib treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02092467; ClinicalTrials.gov.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidVenous ThromboembolismBiomarkersHumansPiperidinesProspective StudiesProteomicsPyrimidinesPyrrolesTumor Necrosis Factor InhibitorsAntirheumatic AgentsBiomarkersPiperidinesPyrimidinesPyrrolestofacitinibTumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitorsantirheumatic agentsarthritis, rheumatoidcardiovascular diseases

Identifiers

PMID36323490
PMCPMC9639150
OpenAlexW4307988519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.