Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36323480›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2022

Associations between sociodemographic and behavioural parameters and child development depending on age and sex: a cross-sectional analysis.

Clara Elise Schild, Christof Meigen, Jonas Kappelt, Wieland Kiess, Tanja Poulain

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02550236 (Prospective Population-based Childhood Cohort Study in the Leipzig Area Investigating Genetic, Environmental, and Metabolic Factors and Their Association With the Development of Civilization Diseases), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02550236 recruitingnot on this map

Prospective Population-based Childhood Cohort Study in the Leipzig Area Investigating Genetic, Environmental, and Metabolic Factors and Their Association With the Development of Civilization Diseases

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of LeipzigRan2010 to 2026Enrolled7,000ConditionsChild Development
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Clara Elise SchildLIFE Leipzig Research Center for Civilization Diseases, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany clara-schild@t-online.de.ORCID 0000-0001-9770-3906
Christof MeigenLIFE Leipzig Research Center for Civilization Diseases, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Jonas KappeltLIFE Leipzig Research Center for Civilization Diseases, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Wieland KiessLIFE Leipzig Research Center for Civilization Diseases, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Tanja PoulainLIFE Leipzig Research Center for Civilization Diseases, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3825-5829
Life University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo explore environmental and individual factors that are associated with child development and to investigate whether the strength of these associations differs according to the age of the children.

designCross-sectional study.

settingThis study was part of the LIFE Child study, a large cohort study conducted in Leipzig, Germany.

participants778 children aged between 0.5 and 6 years (48.6% girls, mean age=2.67 years). OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcomes were cognitive development, language development, body and hand motor skills, social-emotional development, and tracing skills, measured with a standardised development test. We analysed the associations between development and gestational age, socioeconomic status (SES), sex, behavioural difficulties, siblings, sleep duration, breastfeeding duration and overweight/obesity. We also tested for interactions between these variables and child age or sex.

resultsHigher gestational age (b ranging between 0.12 and 0.26) and higher SES (b ranging between 0.08 and 0.21) were associated with better outcomes in almost all developmental domains (all p<0.019). Children with older siblings had improved body and hand motor skills compared with children without older siblings (both b=0.55, all p<0.029). Boys had poorer scores than girls in body and hand motor skills and tracing (b=-0.45, -0.68 and -1.5, all p<0.019). Children with behavioural difficulties had significantly poorer outcomes in most developmental domains. Some of the associations with SES and sex were stronger in older than in younger children. Associations between gestational age and motor development were weaker in older children. We did not find significant associations between child development and sleep duration, breastfeeding duration or overweight/obesity.

conclusionSome factors had a protective, others an adverse effect on development of children under 6 years of age. The effect of SES and sex increased, while the effect of gestational age decreased with age. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02550236.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentOverweightChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfantMaleObesityCommunity child healthDevelopmental neurology & neurodisabilityPAEDIATRICSPUBLIC HEALTHSOCIAL MEDICINE

Identifiers

PMID36323480
PMCPMC9639104
OpenAlexW4307988454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.