Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36323243›Full record

Trial reportInternational archives of allergy and immunology2023

Efficacy and Safety of a Drug-Free, Barrier-Forming Nasal Spray for Allergic Rhinitis: Randomized, Open-Label, Crossover Noninferiority Trial.

Julian Nehrig, Nicole Grosse, Ilja P Hohenfeld, Jens M Hohlfeld, Philipp Badorrek

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International archives of allergy and immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Julian NehrigFraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Medicine ITEM, Hannover, Germany.
Nicole GrosseAltamira Medica AG, Zug, Switzerland.
Ilja P HohenfeldAltamira Medica AG, Zug, Switzerland.
Jens M HohlfeldFraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Medicine ITEM, Hannover, Germany.
Philipp BadorrekFraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Medicine ITEM, Hannover, Germany.
Fraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Medicine · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSymptoms of allergic rhinitis can be reduced by nonpharmacological nasal sprays that create a barrier between allergens and the nasal mucosa. A new nasal spray (AM-301) containing the clay mineral bentonite was tested for its ability to reduce symptoms of grass pollen.

methodsThis open-label, crossover, noninferiority trial compared the efficacy and safety of AM-301 to that of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC; Nasaleze® Allergy Blocker), an established barrier method. Adults with seasonal allergic rhinitis were exposed to Dactylis glomerata pollen, in a controlled setting, the Fraunhofer allergen challenge chamber, first without protection and then protected by HPMC or AM-301 (7 days apart). Efficacy was assessed from total nasal symptom score (TNSS), nasal secretion weight, and subjective rating. The primary endpoint was the difference, between AM-301 and HPMC, in least square mean change in TNSS over a 4-h exposure to allergen.

resultsThe study enrolled 36 persons, and 35 completed all study visits. The mean TNSS was 5.91 (SD = 1.45) during unprotected exposure, 5.20 (SD = 1.70) during protection with HPMC, and 4.82 (SD = 1.74) during protection with AM-301. The difference in least square means between the two treatments was -0.39 (95% CI: -0.89 to 0.10), establishing the noninferiority of AM-301. No difference in mean weight of nasal secretions was observed between the treatments. Efficacy was rated as good or very good for AM-301 by 31% and for HPMC by 14% of subjects. Sixteen subjects reported adverse events with a relationship to AM-301 or HPMC; most adverse events were mild, and none was serious. DISCUSSION/

conclusionAM-301 demonstrated noninferiority toward HPMC in the primary endpoint and was perceived better in subjective secondary endpoints. Both barrier-forming products had a persisting protective effect over 4 h and were safe.

Indexed as

Rhinitis, AllergicRhinitis, Allergic, SeasonalAdministration, IntranasalAdultAllergensDouble-Blind MethodHumansNasal MucosaNasal SpraysAllergensNasal SpraysAllergen challenge chamberAllergyBentoniteDactylis glomerataHydroxypropyl methylcelluloseMedical deviceNasal sprayPollenRhinorrheaThixotropy

Identifiers

PMID36323243
PMCPMC10064392
OpenAlexW4308057523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.