Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36322832›Full record

ArticleJournal of cognitive neuroscience2022

Working Memory Is Complex and Dynamic, Like Your Thoughts.

Timothy J Buschman, Earl K Miller

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Working Memory of Multi-Object Scenes in Primate Frontal Cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Timothy J BuschmanPrinceton University, Princeton, NJ.
Earl K MillerMassachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology · USPrinceton University · US

Funding

Understanding the Network Mechanisms that Control Working MemoryR01MH115042 · NIMH · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI BUSCHMAN, TIMOTHY J. · 2019 to 2022
$1.8M
Interhemispheric coordination and transfer of visual informationR01EY033430 · NEI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI MILLER, EARL K · 2022 to 2025
$1.5M
NEI NIH HHS 1R01EY033430NEI NIH HHS R01 EY033430NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH115042NIMH NIH HHS R01MH115042
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Working memory is where thoughts are held and manipulated. For many years, the dominant model was that working memory relied on steady-state neural dynamics. A neural representation was activated and then held in that state. However, as often happens, the more we examine working memory (especially with new technology), the more complex it looks. Recent discoveries show that working memory involves multiple mechanisms, including discontinuous bouts of spiking. Memories are also dynamic, evolving in a task-dependent manner. Cortical rhythms may control those dynamics, thereby endowing top-down "executive" control over our thoughts.

Indexed as

Executive FunctionMemory, Short-TermHumans

Identifiers

PMID36322832
PMCPMC9832367
OpenAlexW4308061491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.