Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36322770›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

An insect-inspired asymmetric hinge in a double-layer membrane.

Hamed Rajabi, Sepehr H Eraghi, Ali Khaheshi, Arman Toofani, Cherryl Hunt, Robin J Wootton

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. An insect-inspired asymmetric hinge in a double-layer membrane.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hamed RajabiMechanical Intelligence (MI) Research Group, South Bank Applied BioEngineering Research (SABER), School of Engineering, London South Bank University, London SE1 0AA, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1792-3325
Sepehr H EraghiMechanical Intelligence (MI) Research Group, South Bank Applied BioEngineering Research (SABER), School of Engineering, London South Bank University, London SE1 0AA, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4919-0370
Ali KhaheshiMechanical Intelligence (MI) Research Group, South Bank Applied BioEngineering Research (SABER), School of Engineering, London South Bank University, London SE1 0AA, UK.
Arman ToofaniMechanical Intelligence (MI) Research Group, South Bank Applied BioEngineering Research (SABER), School of Engineering, London South Bank University, London SE1 0AA, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1219-7480
Cherryl HuntDepartment of Biosciences, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4PY, UK.
Robin J WoottonDepartment of Biosciences, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4PY, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3838-7007
London South Bank University · GBUniversity of Exeter · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insect wings are deformable airfoils, in which deformations are mostly achieved by complicated interactions between their structural components. Due to the complexity of the wing design and technical challenges associated with testing the delicate wings, we know little about the properties of their components and how they determine wing response to flight forces. Here, we report an unusual structure from the hind-wing membrane of the beetle

Indexed as

ColeopteraWings, AnimalAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaFlight, AnimalInsectaMembranesModels, Biologicalcompliant jointflexion lineflightshape morphingwing

Identifiers

PMID36322770
PMCPMC9661187
OpenAlexW4308145910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.