Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36322745›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Reply to Bhowmik et al.: Democratic climate action and studying extreme climate risks are not in tension.

Luke Kemp, Chi Xu, Joanna Depledge, Kristie L Ebi, Goodwin Gibbins, Timothy A Kohler, Johan Rockström, Marten Scheffer, Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, Will Steffen and 1 more

Abstract readLetterComment
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Reply to Ruhl and Craig: Assessing and governing extreme climate risks needs to be legitimate and democratic.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Luke KempCentre for the Study of Existential Risk, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1SB, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7447-4335
Chi XuSchool of Life Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1841-9032
Joanna DepledgeCambridge Centre for Environment, Energy and Natural Resource Governance, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3QZ, United Kingdom.
Kristie L EbiCenter for Health and the Global Environment, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195.ORCID 0000-0003-4746-8236
Goodwin GibbinsFuture of Humanity Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 0DJ, United Kingdom.
Timothy A KohlerDepartment of Anthropology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-4910.ORCID 0000-0002-3414-6660
Johan RockströmPotsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, 14473 Potsdam, Germany.
Marten SchefferDepartment of Environmental Sciences, University of Wageningen, 6708PB Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2100-0312
Hans Joachim SchellnhuberPotsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, 14473 Potsdam, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7453-4935
Will SteffenFenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1163-6736
Timothy M LentonGlobal Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QE, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6725-7498

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

ClimateResearch

Identifiers

PMID36322745
PMCPMC9659409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.