From Climate Endgame to Climate Long Game.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Moderate global warming does not rule out extreme global climate outcomes.Nature · 2026
   Article
2. Crosstalk between microRNA and oxidative stress in ovarian cancer: diagnosis, pathogenesis and therapeutic resistance.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025
   Review
3. Reply to Bhowmik et al.: Democratic climate action and studying extreme climate risks are not in tension.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  Reply to Bhowmik et al.: Democratic climate action and studying extreme climate risks are not in tension.2022
• Comment on
  Climate Endgame: Exploring catastrophic climate change scenarios.2022

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as