Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36322637›Full record

SynthesisJournal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews2022

Outcomes Between Stemmed and Stemless Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Austin M Looney, Jonathan Day, John L Johnson, Peter S Johnston

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Stemless versus stemmed anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: minimum 2- year follow-up of the global ICON and global unite systems.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Shoulder arthroplasty in the elderly.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Austin M LooneyFrom the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC (Dr. Looney, Dr. Day, and Dr. Johnson), and the Southern Maryland Orthopaedic & Sports Medicine Center, Centers for Advanced Orthopaedics, Leonardtown, MD (Dr. Johnston).
John L Johnson
Peter S Johnston
Georgetown University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBoth stemmed and stemless designs for total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) have demonstrated efficacious outcomes for the surgical treatment of primary glenohumeral joint osteoarthritis. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the clinical outcomes of stemmed versus stemless TSA in randomized controlled trials. We hypothesized that there would be no differences in Constant Score (CS), range of motion, or adverse events, such as periprosthetic fracture and/or revision surgery.

methodsUsing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, a systematic review of the literature was done using MEDLINE, SPORTDiscus, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Outcomes of interest included CS, range of motion, and adverse events (periprosthetic fracture and revision). Summary effect estimates of the mean difference between stemmed and stemless TSA for each outcome were estimated in random effects models.

resultsThe search yielded 301 articles with 4 appropriate for qualitative analysis, including the results of 229 stemmed and 358 stemless TSAs. No significant difference was observed in postoperative CS (P = 0.36), forward flexion (P = 0.93), abduction (P = 0.30), or external rotation (P = 0.34) between stemmed and stemless TSA. No significant difference was observed in change in CS (P = 0.27), forward flexion (P = 0.25), or external rotation (P = 0.74). A change in abduction was significantly different between stemmed and stemless TSA (standardized mean difference = -0.64; 95% confidence interval, -1.20 to -0.08) in favor of stemmed TSA (P = 0.02), attributed to preoperative differences. No significant difference was observed in periprosthetic fractures (P = 0.07) or revision (P = 0.90).

conclusionTSA with stemless versus stemmed humeral components was not associated with notable differences in functional and clinical outcomes. No difference was observed between stemmed and stemless designs in postoperative forward flexion, abduction, or external rotation. Similarly, there was no difference in change in forward flexion or external rotation. A markedly greater improvement in abduction was observed with stemmed TSA, likely due to the lower preoperative motion in the stemmed cohort in one of the studies. No differences were observed between stemmed and stemless designs in the rate of humeral fracture or risk of revision. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II; systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, ShoulderOsteoarthritisPeriprosthetic FracturesHumansProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID36322637
PMCPMC9633087
OpenAlexW4307934638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.