Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36322515›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2022

Integrated xenosurveillance of Loa loa, Wuchereria bancrofti, Mansonella perstans and Plasmodium falciparum using mosquito carcasses and faeces: A pilot study in Cameroon.

Joseph Pryce, Nils Pilotte, Benjamin Menze, Allison R Sirois, Michael Zulch, Jean Pierre Agbor, Steven A Williams, Charles S Wondji, Lisa Reimer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Molecular Surveillance ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Joseph PryceDepartment of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3941-0854
Nils PilotteDepartment of Biological Sciences, Smith College, Northampton, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Benjamin MenzeCentre for Research of Infectious Diseases, Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Allison R SiroisDepartment of Biological Sciences, Smith College, Northampton, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Michael ZulchDepartment of Biological Sciences, Smith College, Northampton, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Jean Pierre AgborCentre for Research of Infectious Diseases, Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Steven A WilliamsDepartment of Biological Sciences, Smith College, Northampton, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Charles S WondjiDepartment of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Lisa ReimerDepartment of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Smith College · USLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBMinistry of Scientific Research and Innovation · CM

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P025285/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunity presence of loiasis must be determined before mass drug administration programmes for lymphatic filariasis and onchocerciasis can be implemented. However, taking human blood samples for loiasis surveillance is invasive and operationally challenging. A xenosurveillance approach based on the molecular screening of mosquitoes and their excreta/feces (E/F) for Loa loa DNA may provide a non-invasive method for detecting the community presence of loiasis.

methodsWe collected 770 wild mosquitoes during a pilot study in a known loiasis transmission area in Mbalmayo, Cameroon. Of these, 376 were preserved immediately while 394 were kept in pools to collect 36-hour E/F samples before processing. Carcasses and E/F were screened for L. loa DNA. To demonstrate this method's potential for integrated disease surveillance, the samples were further tested for Wuchereria bancrofti, Mansonella perstans, and Plasmodium falciparum.

resultsDespite limited sample numbers, L. loa DNA was detected in eight immediately-stored mosquitoes (2.13%; 95% CI 1.08 to 4.14), one carcass stored after providing E/F (0.25%; 95% CI 0.04 to 1.42), and three E/F samples (estimated prevalence 0.77%; 95% CI 0.15 to 2.23%). M. perstans and P. falciparum DNA were also detected in carcasses and E/F samples, while W. bancrofti DNA was detected in E/F. None of the carcasses positive for filarial worm DNA came from pools that provided a positive E/F sample, supporting the theory that, in incompetent vectors, ingested parasites undergo a rapid, complete expulsion in E/F.

conclusionsMosquito xenosurveillance may provide a useful tool for the surveillance of loiasis alongside other parasitic diseases.

Indexed as

CulicidaeLoiasisMalaria, FalciparumAnimalsCameroonFecesHumansLoaMansonellaMosquito VectorsPilot ProjectsPlasmodium falciparumWuchereria bancrofti

Identifiers

PMID36322515
PMCPMC9629651
OpenAlexW4307934924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.