Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36322452›Full record

ArticleJournal of health communication2022

Youth and Young Adult-targeted E-cigarette Warnings and Advertising Messages: An Experiment with Young Adults in the US.

Motasem Kalaji, Alan D Mathios, Chris Skurka, Jeff Niederdeppe, Sahara Byrne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of health communication, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Motasem KalajiDepartment of Communication Studies, Mike Curb College of Arts, Media, and Communication, California State University Northridge, Northridge, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6921-7185
Alan D MathiosJeb E Brooks School of Public Policy, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3718-7000
Chris SkurkaDepartment of Film Production and Media Studies, Donald P. Bellisario College of Communications, Penn State University, University Park, State College, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0613-3475
Jeff NiederdeppeJeb E Brooks School of Public Policy, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7686-1526
Sahara ByrneDepartment of Communication, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5650-3932

Funding

The E-Cigarette Population Paradox: Testing Effects of Youth-Targeted Population Warnings for E-Cigarettes among Two Key PopulationsR01CA246605 · NCI · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI BYRNE, SAHARA ELIZABETH, NIEDERDEPPE, JEFFREY D · 2019 to 2021
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA246605
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Warnings specifically focused on harm to younger users have been understudied in vaping warning research, even while vaping products may appeal specifically to a younger population through implicit advertising strategies. This study examined how youth and young adult-focused e-cigarette health warning messages and implicit advertising strategies influence affective responses, risk perceptions, cognitive elaboration about e-cigarette harms, and willingness to vape in the future. We recruited young adults (who, at the time, were not smoking combustible cigarettes) aged 18-25 to participate in an online survey experiment with a 3 (warning label type: current FDA/youth and young adult risk-focused/none) × 3 (advertising health message strategy: explicit/implicit/none) + 3 (non-vaping products control) design. The results show a main effect for warning such that both FDA and targeted warnings increased negative affect and decreased positive affect compared to no warning. Moreover, the youth and young adult-focused warning boosted youth-specific harm beliefs and cognitive elaboration relative to control and the FDA warning, which did not differ from one another. Implicit health messages produced greater positive affect relative to explicit messages and no message, but the ad strategy manipulations did not influence other outcomes. While the population studied here with a single exposure reported no effects of either manipulation on willingness to vape, previous research has associated similar emotions and cognitions with lowered intentions to vape. Regulatory bodies should consider further exploration of vaping warnings that emphasize youth and young adult-specific harms to educate young people about relevant risks.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsTobacco ProductsVapingAdolescentAdultAdvertisingHumansProduct LabelingSmokingYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID36322452
PMCPMC10868649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.