ArticleMolecular diversity2023
Virtual screening for potential discoidin domain receptor 1 (DDR1) inhibitors based on structural assessment.
Article in Molecular diversity, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Discoidin domain receptor 1 (DDR1) (EC Number 2.7.10.1) has recently been considered as a promising therapeutic target for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). However, none of the currently discovered DDR1 inhibitors have been included in clinical studies due to low target specificity or druggability limitations, necessitating various approaches to develop novel DDR1 inhibitors. In this study, to assure target specificity, a docking assessment of the DDR1 crystal structures was undertaken to find the well-differentiated crystal structure, and 4CKR was identified among many crystal structures. Then, using the best pharmacophore model and molecular docking, virtual screening of the ChEMBL database was done, and five potential molecules were identified as promising inhibitors of DDR1. Subsequently, all hit compound complex systems were validated using molecular dynamics simulations and MM/PBSA methods to assess the stability of the system after ligand binding to DDR1. Based on molecular dynamics simulations and hydrogen-bonding occupancy analysis, the DDR1-Cpd2, DDR1-Cpd17, and DDR1-Cpd18 complex systems exhibited superior stability compared to the DDR1-Cpd1 and DDR-Cpd33 complex systems. Meanwhile, when targeting DDR1, the descending order of the five hit molecules' binding free energies was Cpd17 (- 145.820 kJ/mol) > Cpd2 (- 131.818 kJ/mol) > Cpd18 (- 130.692 kJ/mol) > Cpd33 (- 129.175 kJ/mol) > Cpd1 (- 126.103 kJ/mol). Among them, Cpd2, Cpd17, and Cpd18 showed improved binding characteristics, indicating that they may be potential DDR1 inhibitors. In this research, we developed a high-hit rate, effective screening method that serves as a theoretical guide for finding DDR1 inhibitors for the development of IPF therapeutics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36322341What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.