Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36322196›Full record

ReviewHerz2022

[Treat calcified stenoses correctly].

Recha Blessing, Tommaso Gori

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Herz, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Recha BlessingZentrum für Kardiologie, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland.
Tommaso GoriZentrum für Kardiologie, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland. tommaso.gori@unimedizin-mainz.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the demographic changes with an increasing aging process of the population and the increasing incidence of comorbidities, such as diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension, and chronic kidney disease, older patients with high-risk profiles and calcified coronary lesions are being treated more often in interventional cardiology. Despite advances in technical possibilities and materials, the treatment of severely calcified stenoses continues to be associated with an increased periprocedural risk of complications and poor long-term clinical outcomes. The purpose of this article is to discuss the various treatment approaches and summarize them in an algorithm for the treatment of severely calcified stenoses.

Indexed as

Atherectomy, CoronaryCoronary Artery DiseasePercutaneous Coronary InterventionVascular CalcificationConstriction, PathologicCoronary AngiographyHumansSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeAtherectomyCoronary lesionsInterventional cardiologyIntravascular imagingIntravascular lithotripsy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.