Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36322191›Full record

ArticleLangmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids2022

The Influence of Nanobubble Size and Stability on Ultrasound Enhanced Drug Delivery.

Damien V B Batchelor, Fern J Armistead, Nicola Ingram, Sally A Peyman, James R McLaughlan, P Louise Coletta, Stephen D Evans

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Biofilm · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. "Biomaterials translational · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Damien V B BatchelorMolecular and Nanoscale Physics Group, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leeds, LeedsLS2 9JT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6489-9578
Fern J ArmisteadMolecular and Nanoscale Physics Group, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leeds, LeedsLS2 9JT, United Kingdom.
Nicola IngramLeeds Institute of Medical Research, Wellcome Trust Brenner Building, St James's University Hospital, LeedsLS9 7TF, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5274-8502
Sally A PeymanMolecular and Nanoscale Physics Group, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leeds, LeedsLS2 9JT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1600-5100
James R McLaughlanLeeds Institute of Medical Research, Wellcome Trust Brenner Building, St James's University Hospital, LeedsLS9 7TF, United Kingdom.
P Louise ColettaLeeds Institute of Medical Research, Wellcome Trust Brenner Building, St James's University Hospital, LeedsLS9 7TF, United Kingdom.
Stephen D EvansMolecular and Nanoscale Physics Group, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leeds, LeedsLS2 9JT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8342-5335
University of Leeds · GBSt James's University Hospital · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/M009084/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lipid-shelled nanobubbles (NBs) are emerging as potential dual diagnostic and therapeutic agents. Similar to their micron-scale counterparts, microbubbles (1-10 μm), they can act as ultrasound contrast agents as well as locally enhance therapeutic uptake. Recently, it has been shown that the reduced size of NBs (<1 μm) promotes increased uptake and accumulation in tumor interstitial space, which can enhance their diagnostic and therapeutic performance. However, accurate characterization of NB size and concentration is challenging and may limit their translation into clinical use. Their submicron nature limits accuracy of conventional microscopy techniques, while common light scattering techniques fail to distinguish between subpopulations present in NB samples (i.e., bubbles and liposomes). Due to the difficulty in the characterization of NBs, relatively little is known about the influence of size on their therapeutic performance. In this study, we describe a novel method of using a commercially available nanoparticle tracking analysis system, to distinguish between NBs and liposomes based on their differing optical properties. We used this technique to characterize three NB populations of varying size, isolated via centrifugation, and subsequently used this to assess their potential for enhancing localized delivery. Confocal fluorescence microscopy and image analysis were used to quantify the ultrasound enhanced uptake of fluorescent dextran into live colorectal cancer cells. Our results showed that the amount of localized uptake did not follow the expected trends, in which larger NB populations out-perform smaller NBs, at matched concentration. To understand this observed behavior, the stability of each NB population was assessed. It was found that dilution of the NB samples from their stock concentration influences their stability, and it is hypothesized that both the total free lipid and interbubble distance play a role in NB lifetime, in agreement with previously proposed theories and models.

Indexed as

LiposomesMicrobubblesContrast MediaDrug Delivery SystemsLipidsUltrasonographyContrast MediaLipidsLiposomes

Identifiers

PMID36322191
PMCPMC9671049
OpenAlexW4307972420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.