Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36322161›Full record

ArticleClinical neuroradiology2023

Feasibility, Safety, and Technical Success of the Flying Intervention Team in Acute Ischemic Stroke : Comparison of Interventions in Different Primary Stroke Centers with those in a Comprehensive Stroke Center.

Alexander Kettner, Felix Schlachetzki, Tobias Boeckh-Behrens, Claus Zimmer, Silke Wunderlich, Frank Kraus, Roman Ludwig Haberl, Gordian Jan Hubert, Sandra Boy, Julia Henninger and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical neuroradiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Alexander KettnerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Felix SchlachetzkiTEMPiS Telemedical Stroke Center, Department of Neurology, Center for Vascular Neurology and Intensive Care, University of Regensburg, Medbo Bezirksklinikum, Regensburg, Germany.
Tobias Boeckh-BehrensDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Claus ZimmerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Silke WunderlichDepartment of Neurology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Frank KrausTEMPiS Telemedical Stroke Center, Department of Neurology, München Klinik Harlaching, Munich, Germany.
Roman Ludwig HaberlTEMPiS Telemedical Stroke Center, Department of Neurology, München Klinik Harlaching, Munich, Germany.
Gordian Jan HubertTEMPiS Telemedical Stroke Center, Department of Neurology, München Klinik Harlaching, Munich, Germany.
Sandra BoyDepartment of Neurology, Asklepios Stadtklinik Bad Tölz, Bad Tölz, Germany.
Julia HenningerMedical Department, Klinikum Dritter Orden, Munich, Germany.
Benjamin FriedrichTemedica GmbH, Munich, Germany.
Christian MaegerleinDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany. christian.maegerlein@tum.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4885-7671

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrompt endovascular care of patients with ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (LVO) remains a major challenge in rural regions as primary stroke centers (PSC) usually cannot provide neuro-interventional services. Objective The core content of the Flying Intervention Team (FIT) project is to perform thrombectomy on-site at a local PSC after the neuro-interventionalist has been transported via helicopter to the target hospital. An important and so far unanswered question is whether mechanical thrombectomy can be performed as safely and successfully on-site as in a specialized comprehensive stroke center (CSC).

methodsComparison of 100 FIT thrombectomies on site in 14 different PSCs with 128 control thrombectomies at 1 CSC (79 drip-and-ship, 49 mothership) performed by a single interventionalist with respect to technical-procedural success parameters, procedural times, and complications.

resultsThere were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of technical success (95.0% successful interventions in FIT group vs. 94.5% in control group, p = 0.60) and complications (3% major complications in FIT vs. 1.6% in control group, p = 0.47). Regarding time from onset to groin puncture, there was no difference between FIT and the entire control group (182 vs. 183 min, p = 0.28), but a trend in favor of FIT compared with the drip-and-ship control subgroup (182 vs. 210 min, p = 0.096).

conclusionsAirborne neuro-interventional thrombectomy service is a feasible approach for rural regions. If performed by experienced neuro-interventionalists, technical success and complication rates are comparable to treatment in a specialized neuro-interventional department.

Indexed as

Brain IschemiaEndovascular ProceduresIschemic StrokeStrokeFeasibility StudiesHumansRetrospective StudiesThrombectomyTreatment OutcomeFITFlying interventionalistHelicopterHelistrokeMechanical thrombectomy

Identifiers

PMID36322161
PMCPMC10219878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.