Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36322109›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2022

Automatic Screening of Pediatric Renal Ultrasound Abnormalities: Deep Learning and Transfer Learning Approach.

Ming-Chin Tsai, Henry Horng-Shing Lu, Yueh-Chuan Chang, Yung-Chieh Huang, Lin-Shien Fu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ming-Chin TsaiDepartment of Pediatrics, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7206-4228
Henry Horng-Shing LuInstitute of Statistics, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsing-chu, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4392-3361
Yueh-Chuan ChangInstitute of Electrical & Control Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsing-chu, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6529-1724
Yung-Chieh HuangDepartment of Pediatrics, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2945-4404
Lin-Shien FuDepartment of Pediatrics, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4770-3208

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn recent years, the progress and generalization surrounding portable ultrasonic probes has made ultrasound (US) a useful tool for physicians when making a diagnosis. With the advent of machine learning and deep learning, the development of a computer-aided diagnostic system for screening renal US abnormalities can assist general practitioners in the early detection of pediatric kidney diseases.

objectiveIn this paper, we sought to evaluate the diagnostic performance of deep learning techniques to classify kidney images as normal and abnormal.

methodsWe chose 330 normal and 1269 abnormal pediatric renal US images for establishing a model for artificial intelligence. The abnormal images involved stones, cysts, hyperechogenicity, space-occupying lesions, and hydronephrosis. We performed preprocessing of the original images for subsequent deep learning. We redefined the final connecting layers for classification of the extracted features as abnormal or normal from the ResNet-50 pretrained model. The performances of the model were tested by a validation data set using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity.

resultsThe deep learning model, 94 MB parameters in size, based on ResNet-50, was built for classifying normal and abnormal images. The accuracy, (%)/area under curve, of the validated images of stone, cyst, hyperechogenicity, space-occupying lesions, and hydronephrosis were 93.2/0.973, 91.6/0.940, 89.9/0.940, 91.3/0.934, and 94.1/0.996, respectively. The accuracy of normal image classification in the validation data set was 90.1%. Overall accuracy of (%)/area under curve was 92.9/0.959..

conclusionsWe established a useful, computer-aided model for automatic classification of pediatric renal US images in terms of normal and abnormal categories.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceclinical informaticsconvolutional neural networksdeep learningdiagnostic systemmedical imagepediatricpediatric renal ultrasound imagescreeningtransfer learningultrasound image

Identifiers

PMID36322109
PMCPMC9669887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.