ArticleJMIR medical informatics2022
Automatic Screening of Pediatric Renal Ultrasound Abnormalities: Deep Learning and Transfer Learning Approach.
Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in pediatric nephrology: current applications and emerging frameworks for evidence generation.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in nephrology: predicting CKD progression and personalizing treatment.International urology and nephrology · 2026Review
- AI-powered insights in pediatric nephrology: current applications and future opportunities.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Review
- Transforming Pediatric Urology With Artificial Intelligence: A Narrative Review of Current Evidence and Practice.Cureus · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Nephrology: From Early Detection to Clinical Management of Kidney Diseases.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Comparison of neural networks for classification of urinary tract dilation from renal ultrasounds: evaluation of agreement with expert categorization.Pediatric radiology · 2025Article
- Leveraging ensemble convolutional neural networks and metaheuristic strategies for advanced kidney disease screening and classification.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Deep learning in renal ultrasound: applications, challenges, and future outlook.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence Tools in Pediatric Urology: A Comprehensive Review of Recent Advances.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Pilot study of machine learning in the task of distinguishing high and low-grade pediatric hydronephrosis on ultrasound.Investigative and clinical urology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn recent years, the progress and generalization surrounding portable ultrasonic probes has made ultrasound (US) a useful tool for physicians when making a diagnosis. With the advent of machine learning and deep learning, the development of a computer-aided diagnostic system for screening renal US abnormalities can assist general practitioners in the early detection of pediatric kidney diseases.
objectiveIn this paper, we sought to evaluate the diagnostic performance of deep learning techniques to classify kidney images as normal and abnormal.
methodsWe chose 330 normal and 1269 abnormal pediatric renal US images for establishing a model for artificial intelligence. The abnormal images involved stones, cysts, hyperechogenicity, space-occupying lesions, and hydronephrosis. We performed preprocessing of the original images for subsequent deep learning. We redefined the final connecting layers for classification of the extracted features as abnormal or normal from the ResNet-50 pretrained model. The performances of the model were tested by a validation data set using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity.
resultsThe deep learning model, 94 MB parameters in size, based on ResNet-50, was built for classifying normal and abnormal images. The accuracy, (%)/area under curve, of the validated images of stone, cyst, hyperechogenicity, space-occupying lesions, and hydronephrosis were 93.2/0.973, 91.6/0.940, 89.9/0.940, 91.3/0.934, and 94.1/0.996, respectively. The accuracy of normal image classification in the validation data set was 90.1%. Overall accuracy of (%)/area under curve was 92.9/0.959..
conclusionsWe established a useful, computer-aided model for automatic classification of pediatric renal US images in terms of normal and abnormal categories.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.