Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36322102›Full record

Trial reportNeuro-oncology2022

Safety and patterns of survivorship in recurrent GBM following resection and surgically targeted radiation therapy: Results from a prospective trial.

Kris Smith, Peter Nakaji, Theresa Thomas, Dilini Pinnaduwage, Garrick Wallstrom, Mehee Choi, Joseph Zabramski, Clark Chen, David Brachman

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neuro-oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. GammaTileJournal of neuro-oncology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kris SmithDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Peter NakajiDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Theresa ThomasRadiation Oncology, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Dilini PinnaduwageRadiation Oncology, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Garrick WallstromDivision of Biostatistics, Statistics and Data Corporation, Tempe, Arizona, USA.
Mehee ChoiRadiation Oncology, GT Medical Technologies, Tempe, Arizona, USA.
Joseph ZabramskiDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Clark ChenDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
David BrachmanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Barrow Neurological Institute · USNeurological Surgery · USSt. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTreatment of recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) remains problematic with survival after additional therapy typically less than 12 months. We prospectively evaluated whether outcomes might be improved with resection plus permanent implantation of a novel radiation device utilizing the gamma-emitting isotope Cs-131 embedded within bioresorbable collagen tiles.

methodsRecurrent histologic GBM were treated in a single-arm trial. Following radiation, the surgical bed was lined with the tiles. Subsequent treatments were at the treating physician's discretion.

results28 patients were treated (20 at first recurrence, range 1-3). Median age was 58 years, KPS was 80, female:male ratio was 10:18. Methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) was methylated in 11%, unmethylated in 18%, and unknown in 71%. Post implant, 17 patients (61%) received ≥1 course of systemic therapy. For all patients, Kaplan-Meier estimates of median time to local failure were 12.1 months, post-implant survival was 10.7 months for all patients and 15.1 months for patients who received systemic therapy; for all patients, median overall survival from diagnosis was 25.0 months (range 9.1-143.1). Sex, age, and number of prior progressions were not statistically significant. Local control was continuously maintained in 46% of patients. Two deaths within 30 days occurred, one from intracranial hemorrhage and one after persistent coma. Three symptomatic adverse events occurred: one wound infection requiring surgery and two late radiation brain injury, resolved non-surgically.

conclusionThis pre-commercial trial demonstrated acceptable safety and favorable post-treatment local control and survival. The device has received FDA clearance for use in newly diagnosed malignant and all recurrent intracranial neoplasms.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaCesium RadioisotopesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProspective StudiesSurvivorshipCesium-131Cesium RadioisotopesBevacizumabBrachytherapyCesium-131 (Cs-131)GBMRadiationSurgically Targeted Radiation Therapy (STaRT)

Identifiers

PMID36322102
PMCPMC9629483
OpenAlexW4308253340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.