Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36321909›Full record

ArticleFamily practice2024

Foot, ankle, and leg problems in Australian primary care: consultation patterns, management practices, and costs.

Hylton B Menz, Cylie M Williams, Peter A Lazzarini, Julie Gordon, Christopher Harrison

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Family practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Hylton B MenzDiscipline of Podiatry, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC 3086, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2045-3846
Cylie M WilliamsSchool of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, Frankston, VIC 3199, Australia.
Peter A LazzariniSchool of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland 4059, Australia.
Julie GordonWHO-CC for Strengthening Rehabilitation Capacity in Health Systems, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Christopher HarrisonMenzies Centre for Health Policy, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
The University of Sydney · AULa Trobe University · AUMonash University · AUQueensland University of Technology · AU

Funding

Abbott Australasia Pty LtdAbbVie Pty LtdAstraZeneca Pty LtdAustralian Government Department of HealthAustralian Government Department of Veterans' AffairsAventis Pharma Pty LtdBayer Australia LtdbioCSL (Australia) Pty LtdGlaxoSmithKline Australia Pty LtdJanssen-Cilag Pty LtdMerck, Sharpe and Dohme (Australia) Pty LtdNational Prescribing ServiceNovartis Pharmaceuticals Australia Pty LtdPfizer AustraliaRoche Products Pty LtdSanofi-Aventis Australia Pty LtdWyeth Australia Pty Ltd
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore consultation patterns, management practices, and costs of foot, ankle, and leg problems in Australian primary care. STUDY

designWe analyzed data from the Bettering the Evaluation and Care of Health program, April 2000 to March 2016. Foot, ankle, and leg problems were identified using the International Classification of Primary Care, Version 2 PLUS terminology. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics examining general practitioner (GP) and patient characteristics associated with a foot, ankle, or leg problem being managed. Cost to government was estimated by extracting fees for GP consultations, diagnostic imaging, and pathology services from the Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) database. Costs for prescription-only medicines were extracted from the Pharmaceutical Benefits Schedule and for nonprescribed medications, large banner discount pharmacy prices were used.

resultsGPs recorded 1,568,100 patient encounters, at which 50,877 foot, ankle, or leg problems were managed at a rate of 3.24 (95% confidence intervals [CIs] 3.21-3.28) per 100 encounters. The management rate of foot, ankle, or leg problems was higher for certain patient characteristics (older, having a health care card, socioeconomically disadvantaged, non-Indigenous, and being English speaking) and GP characteristics (male sex, older age, and Australian graduate). The most frequently used management practice was the use of medications. The average cost (Australian dollars) per encounter was A$52, with the total annual cost estimated at A$256m.

conclusionsFoot, ankle, and leg problems are frequently managed by GPs, and the costs associated with their management represent a substantial economic impact in Australian primary care.

Indexed as

Practice Patterns, Physicians'Primary Health CareReferral and ConsultationAdolescentAdultAgedAnkleAustraliaChildChild, PreschoolFemaleFoot DiseasesHumansInfantLegMalediabetic footfootfoot diseasesfoot injuriesgeneral practicehealth care costsprimary health care

Identifiers

PMID36321909
PMCPMC11324318
OpenAlexW4307973154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.