Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36321876›Full record

ArticleeLife2022

Visual experience has opposing influences on the quality of stimulus representation in adult primary visual cortex.

Brian B Jeon, Thomas Fuchs, Steven M Chase, Sandra J Kuhlman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Brian B JeonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, United States.
Thomas FuchsCenter for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, United States.
Steven M ChaseDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, United States.
Sandra J KuhlmanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0450-7282
Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition · US

Funding

Inhibitory regulation of visual processing and plasticity in visual cortexR01EY024678 · NEI · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI KUHLMAN, SANDRA J · 2014 to 2018
$1.8M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY024678
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transient dark exposure, typically 7-10 days in duration, followed by light reintroduction is an emerging treatment for improving the restoration of vision in amblyopic subjects whose occlusion is removed in adulthood. Dark exposure initiates homeostatic mechanisms that together with light-induced changes in cellular signaling pathways result in the re-engagement of juvenile-like plasticity in the adult such that previously deprived inputs can gain cortical territory. It is possible that dark exposure itself degrades visual responses, and this could place constraints on the optimal duration of dark exposure treatment. To determine whether eight days of dark exposure has a lasting negative impact on responses to classic grating stimuli, neural activity was recorded before and after dark exposure in awake head-fixed mice using two-photon calcium imaging. Neural discriminability, assessed using classifiers, was transiently reduced following dark exposure; a decrease in response reliability across a broad range of spatial frequencies likely contributed to the disruption. Both discriminability and reliability recovered. Fixed classifiers were used to demonstrate that stimulus representation rebounded to the original, pre-deprivation state, thus dark exposure did not appear to have a lasting negative impact on visual processing. Unexpectedly, we found that dark exposure significantly stabilized orientation preference and signal correlation. Our results reveal that natural vision exerts a disrupting influence on the stability of stimulus preference for classic grating stimuli and, at the same time, improves neural discriminability for both low and high-spatial frequency stimuli.

Indexed as

AmblyopiaVisual CortexAnimalsMicePhotic StimulationPrimary Visual CortexReproducibility of Resultscalcium imagingdark exposuredecodingmouseneurosciencesensory

Identifiers

PMID36321876
PMCPMC9629826
OpenAlexW4308114809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.