Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36321583›Full record

Observational studyDeutsches Arzteblatt international2022

Outcome Quality After Colorectal Cancer Resection in Certified Colorectal Cancer Centers—Patient-Reported and Short-Term Clinical Outcomes.

Christoph Kowalski, Nora Tabea Sibert, Clara Breidenbach, Anna Hagemeier, Rebecca Roth, Thomas Seufferlein, Stefan Benz, Stefan Post, Robert Siegel, Armin Wiegering and 31 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. In Reply.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2023
    Article
  11. Clinically Relevant Consequences Are Lacking.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

41 authors.

Christoph Kowalski
Nora Tabea Sibert
Clara Breidenbach
Anna Hagemeier
Rebecca Roth
Thomas Seufferlein
Stefan Benz
Stefan Post
Robert Siegel
Armin Wiegering
Raphael Winkels
Stefanie Bieck-Messemer
Jörg Fahlke
Christoph Reissfelder
Martin Fuchs
Torsten Herzog
Richard Weihrauch
Julia Faber-Mertens
Hagen Rudolph
László Puskás
Kay Kohlhaw
Malgorzata Szczerbinska
Hubert Scheuerlein
Philipp-Alexander Neumann
Stephan Hollerbach
Maren Riechmann
Ernst W Kolbe
Norbert Weigert
Jörg Köninger
Christian Klink
Shueb Mussa
Anja-Kathrin Horn
Ludger Staib
Jens Werner
Joachim Jähne
Mohamed Aly
Hubert Mörk
Robert Grützmann
Pompilio Piso
Sebastian Dieng
Simone Wesselmann

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn this observational study, patient-reported outcomes and short-term clinical outcome parameters in patients with colorectal cancer were studied 12 months after the start of treatment. Outcomes were also compared across German Certified Colorectal Cancer Centres.

methodsData were collected from 4239 patients with colorectal cancer who had undergone elective tumor resection in one of 102 colorectal cancer centers and had responded to a quality-of-life questionnaire before treatment (EORTC QLQ-C30 and -CR29). 3142 (74.1%) of these patients completed a post-treatment questionnaire 12 months later. Correlation analyses were calculated and case-mix adjusted comparisons across centers were made for selected patient-reported outcomes, anastomotic insufficiency, and 30-day-mortality.

resultsAt 12 months, mild improvements were seen in mean quality-of-life scores (66 vs. 62 points), constipation (16 vs. 19), and abdominal pain (15 vs. 17). Worsening was seen in physical function (75 vs. 82) and pain (22 vs. 19). Better patient-reported outcomes at 12 months were associated with better scores before treatment. Better results in at least three of the five scores were associated with male sex, higher educational level, higher age, and private health insurance. Major worsening of fecal incontinence was seen among patients with rectal cancer without a stoma. The largest differences across centers were found with respect to physical function. Anastomotic insufficiency was found in 4.3% of colon cancer patients and 8.2% of rectal cancer patients. 1.9% of patients died within 30 days after their resection.

conclusionClinicians can use these findings to identify patients at higher risk for poorer patient-reported outcomes. The differences among cancer centers that were found imply that measures for quality improvement would be desirable.

Indexed as

Intestinal NeoplasmsRectal NeoplasmsConstipationHumansMalePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality of LifeSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID36321583
PMCPMC10074266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.