Trial reportBJS open2022
Impact of long-course neoadjuvant radiation on postoperative low anterior resection syndrome and stoma status in rectal cancer: long-term functional follow-up of a randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in BJS open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of neoadjuvant treatment on functional outcomes after transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME)-a case series.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Trial
- The revisional burden of colostomy: a temporal analysis of risk, patterns, and survival.Techniques in coloproctology · 2026Article
- Quality of Life and Functional Outcomes After Rectal Cancer Surgery: A Comparative Study Applying EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-CR29, and LARS Score at 1-6 Months Postoperatively.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Four clinical dilemmas in surgical decision making for low rectal cancer.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Clinical Outcomes of Ileostomy Closure during versus after Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Rectal Cancer.Canadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology · 2024Article
- Risk factors for severe low anterior resection syndrome in patients with rectal cancer undergoing sphincter‑preserving resection: A systematic review and meta‑analysis.Oncology letters · 2024Article
- Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) after Surgery for Rectal Cancer: An Inevitable Price to Pay for Survival, or a Preventable Complication?Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNeoadjuvant radiation has been increasingly associated with postoperative bowel dysfunction, including low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). Although permanent stoma often results from severe bowel dysfunction and significantly impacts quality of life, the presence of stoma paradoxically excludes patients from functional follow-up. Hence, stoma status is rarely reported along with LARS, while assessment of both is essential for the comprehensive evaluation of bowel dysfunction in long-term survivors of rectal cancer.
methodPatients enrolled into the Neoadjuvant FOLFOX6 Chemotherapy with or without Radiation in Rectal Cancer (FOWARC) multicentre randomized clinical trial were randomized to receive long-course neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) or chemotherapy (nCT) followed by sphincter-saving proctectomy and longitudinal follow-up. The primary outcome of the trial was disease-free survival. LARS score and stoma status were assessed secondarily for postoperative bowel function in the largest single-centre cohort of the trial.
resultsOverall, 327 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer were enrolled in the original trial and 203 responded after a median follow-up of 83.4 months, of whom 24 (11.8 per cent) had persistent stoma, and 48 patients (23.6 per cent) reported major LARS. Compared with the nCT group, the nCRT group reported more persistent stomas (16.5 per cent versus 4.9 per cent, P = 0.014), and more major LARS in patients without persistent stoma (34.7 per cent versus 16.7 per cent, P = 0.003). The combined prevalence of persistent stoma and major LARS was significantly higher in the nCRT group (45.5 per cent versus 20.7 per cent, P < 0.001). Long-course neoadjuvant radiation (OR 2.20, 95 per cent c.i. 1.10 to 4.40, P = 0.027), height of anastomosis (OR 0.74, 95 per cent c.i. 0.61 to 0.91, P = 0.004), and anastomotic leak (OR 4.97, 95 per cent c.i. 2.24 to 11.05, P < 0.001) were associated with persistent stoma and major LARS in multivariate analysis.
conclusionMore than one-third of patients receiving sphincter-saving proctectomy reported major LARS or persistent stoma at long-term follow-up. Long-course neoadjuvant radiation, low anastomosis, and postoperative leak are independent risk factors for persistent stoma and major LARS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.