Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36321374›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2022

A continuous statistical-geometric framework for normative and impaired gaits.

Krithika Swaminathan, Irina Tolkova, Lauren Baker, Dheepak Arumukhom Revi, Louis N Awad, Conor J Walsh, L Mahadevan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Multi-Modal Sensing for Propulsion Estimation in People Post-Stroke Across Speeds.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2025
    Article
  3. Identification of Subtypes of Post-Stroke and Neurotypical Gait Behaviors Using Neural Network Analysis of Gait Cycle Kinematics.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Krithika SwaminathanSchool of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7570-1408
Irina TolkovaSchool of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2989-7283
Lauren BakerSchool of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Dheepak Arumukhom ReviCollege of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Sargent College, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6943-0258
Louis N AwadCollege of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Sargent College, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0159-8011
Conor J WalshSchool of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2744-917X
L MahadevanSchool of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5114-0519

Funding

Development of a Modular Soft Exosuit Platform Suitable for Community-Based NeurorehabilitationR01HD088619 · NICHD · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI WALSH, CONOR · 2016 to 2021
$3.9M
Real-time quantification of muscle-tendon dynamics for individualized and adaptive robot-assisted locomotionR21AR076686 · NIAMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI HOWE, ROBERT D · 2020 to 2021
$415k
NIAMS NIH HHS R21 AR076686NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD088619
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A quantitative analysis of human gait patterns in space-time provides an opportunity to observe variability within and across individuals of varying motor capabilities. Impaired gait significantly affects independence and quality of life, and thus a large part of clinical research is dedicated to improving gait through rehabilitative therapies. Evaluation of these paradigms relies on understanding the characteristic differences in the kinematics and underlying biomechanics of impaired and unimpaired locomotion, which has motivated quantitative measurement and analysis of the gait cycle. Previous analysis has largely been limited to a statistical comparison of manually selected pointwise metrics identified through expert knowledge. Here, we use a recent statistical-geometric framework, elastic functional data analysis (FDA), to decompose kinematic data into continuous 'amplitude' (spatial) and 'phase' (temporal) components, which can then be integrated with established dimensionality reduction techniques. We demonstrate the utility of elastic FDA through two unsupervised applications to post-stroke gait datasets. First, we distinguish between unimpaired, paretic and non-paretic gait presentations. Then, we use FDA to reveal robust, interpretable groups of differential response to exosuit assistance. The proposed methods aim to benefit clinical practice for post-stroke gait rehabilitation, and more broadly, to automate the quantitative analysis of motion.

Indexed as

StrokeStroke RehabilitationBiomechanical PhenomenaGaitHumansQuality of LifeWalkingelastic functional data analysisgait analysisgeometric statistics

Identifiers

PMID36321374
PMCPMC9627451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.