Study of molar properties of GO after doping with transition metals for photodegradation of fluorescent dyes.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Nd:ZnS@GO nanotubes: a novel adsorbent cum photocatalyst for efficient removal of antibiotics and dyes from wastewater.RSC advances · 2025
   Article
2. B@LGTs of Nd, Eu, Er, and Yb lanthanides with physicochemical interfacing for enhanced photocatalytic reduction of fluorescent dyes, transition metal ions, and quinonoid phenolphthalein.RSC advances · 2025
   Article
3. Versatile photocatalytic activities of indenoquinoxalines for dye reduction, single-crystal nucleation, and MNP formation with iron scrap under sunlight.RSC advances · 2024
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract