Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36321088›Full record

ArticleRSC advances2022

Sodium alginate as an eco-friendly rheology modifier and salt-tolerant fluid loss additive in water-based drilling fluids.

Zhaojie Wei, Maosen Wang, Ying Li, Yinghui An, Kaijun Li, Kun Bo, Mingyi Guo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RSC advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zhaojie WeiCollege of Construction Engineering, Jilin University Changchun 130021 China guomingyi@jlu.edu.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1901-4547
Maosen WangCollege of Construction Engineering, Jilin University Changchun 130021 China guomingyi@jlu.edu.cn.
Ying LiCollege of Construction Engineering, Jilin University Changchun 130021 China guomingyi@jlu.edu.cn.
Yinghui AnCollege of Construction Engineering, Jilin University Changchun 130021 China guomingyi@jlu.edu.cn.
Kaijun LiCollege of Construction Engineering, Jilin University Changchun 130021 China guomingyi@jlu.edu.cn.
Kun BoCollege of Construction Engineering, Jilin University Changchun 130021 China guomingyi@jlu.edu.cn.
Mingyi GuoCollege of Construction Engineering, Jilin University Changchun 130021 China guomingyi@jlu.edu.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1356-0341

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rheological and filtration performance of drilling fluids greatly depends on the additives used. To address the negative impact on the drilling fluid performance stemming from electrolyte contamination, a sustainable sodium alginate (SA) biopolymer was employed as an additive in water-based drilling fluids to overcome the performance deterioration caused by the polyelectrolyte effect under salt contamination. The results demonstrated that SA performs better than sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (Na-CMC) and polyanionic cellulose (PAC-LV), the widely used drilling fluid additives. Although exposed to highly concentrated salt contamination, the addition of SA can mitigate viscosity variation and maintain a lower filtration volume of a base fluid (BF), whereas an advanced variation in CMC/BF and PAC/BF was observed. The possible rheology and filtration mechanism of SA under highly concentrated salt contamination were investigated through zeta potential, particle size distribution, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The results revealed that the anchoring groups on the SA molecular chain enable them to strongly adsorb on the negatively charged bentonite surface

Identifiers

PMID36321088
PMCPMC9580471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.