ArticleCureus2022
Google Classroom as a Teaching Tool for Undergraduate Embryology.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Students' Assessment of Digital Technologies in Nursing Education.Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Context and aim Modern teaching of medicine has evolved into a beyond-the-classroom experience. Learning management systems (LMSs) have made this possible because of easy accessibility and user-friendliness. The COVID-19 lockdown further accentuated the need for this mode of education delivery. General embryology (GE) is a subject under human anatomy that does not rely on "touch-and-feel" as much as other medical subjects. Assess Google Classroom (GC) as a teaching tool to deliver an online undergraduate-level general embryology (GE) course. Settings and design A cross-sectional study involving 211 undergraduate medical students across India. Methods and material A pre-and post-quiz model was adopted to evaluate the efficiency of a five-lecture course on GE. The course content was delivered via 20-minute YouTube video lectures, uploaded on GC. Lastly, student feedback regarding gadget preferences and the overall learning experience was collected. Statistical Analysis: The confidence interval was set at 95%, and a p-value </= 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data were analyzed using SPSS software v.23. Results We observed a significant increase in mean quiz scores of all quizzes with increased perceived confidence in the subject, yet a high attrition rate (74.8 %). GC scored a 4.3/5 for user-friendliness, and 83.7% of students preferred cell phones for accessing GC. Conclusion GC, with its limitations, poses a significant challenge to teaching GE online. Software updates in the future might prove it to be a competent alternative to other LMSs in the market. GC falls short in terms of providing optimum levels of assessment and interaction for learning complex topics like embryology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.