ArticleCureus2022
Kumar and Daigavane's Impacted Maxillary Canine Grading System: A New Classification System For Treatment of Cleft Lip and Palate.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Maxillary canines are the most commonly impacted teeth, second only to third molars. Cleft lip and palate patients have a higher chance of impacted canines due to defects in bone formation and the soft tissue enclosing it. Various authors have used two-dimensional radiographs and developed grading systems to streamline treatment modalities to deal with the impacted canines. Material and Methods A study was conducted in the Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics. Children aged nine to 12 were selected for this evaluation based on both clinical and radiographic examination. Four different parameters were set to evaluate the impacted canine location. which was based on angulation, vertical height, root apex location, and defect area involved. Result Based on these evaluations, a classification was developed by the present authors, and later the cases were assessed as per the new system that we named Kumar and Daigavane's (KD) Impacted Maxillary Canine Grading System which we developed to give us more clarity for treatment and prognosis for treatment of cleft lip and palate. Conclusion A three-dimensional evaluation is also advised for a better understanding of the impacted canines. Many of the shortcomings of the two-dimensional assessment can be diminished. This new grading system will improve cleft diagnosis and prognosis in patients with cleft lips and/or palates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.