Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36320815›Full record

ArticleSN comprehensive clinical medicine2022

Managing Complexity: The Experience of an Italian Internal Medicine Unit During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic, Looking to the Future.

Daniela Tortola, Elena Magnani, Enrico Giorgini, Maria Cristina Zani, Chiara Pazzaglini, Paola Sambo, Luca Montaguti

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in SN comprehensive clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daniela TortolaInternal Medicine Unit, Cesena M. Bufalini Hospital, AUSL Della Romagna: Azienda Unità Sanitaria Della Romagna, Cesena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3212-3999
Elena MagnaniInternal Medicine Unit, Cesena M. Bufalini Hospital, AUSL Della Romagna: Azienda Unità Sanitaria Della Romagna, Cesena, Italy.
Enrico GiorginiInternal Medicine Unit, Cesena M. Bufalini Hospital, AUSL Della Romagna: Azienda Unità Sanitaria Della Romagna, Cesena, Italy.
Maria Cristina ZaniInternal Medicine Unit, Cesena M. Bufalini Hospital, AUSL Della Romagna: Azienda Unità Sanitaria Della Romagna, Cesena, Italy.
Chiara PazzagliniInternal Medicine Unit, Cesena M. Bufalini Hospital, AUSL Della Romagna: Azienda Unità Sanitaria Della Romagna, Cesena, Italy.
Paola SamboInternal Medicine Unit, Cesena M. Bufalini Hospital, AUSL Della Romagna: Azienda Unità Sanitaria Della Romagna, Cesena, Italy.
Luca MontagutiInternal Medicine Unit, Cesena M. Bufalini Hospital, AUSL Della Romagna: Azienda Unità Sanitaria Della Romagna, Cesena, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The impact of COVID-19 pandemic put the Italian health system into a test. In the period between September 2020 and June 2021, a weekly average of 114 SARS-CoV-2 infections were recorded in Forlì-Cesena province (north of Italy), with a maximum of 330 cases per week in March 2021; in the same months, the Internal Medicine Unit of Cesena M. Bufalini Hospital managed 954 COVID-19 patients. To allow the management of these patients, the ward was divided into areas at different intensity of care, with a maximum of 39-47 beds and 19-24 in ordinary and sub-intensive area, respectively. Patients had an average age of 66 years, and 62% of the total was female; prevalent comorbidities were arterial hypertension (53%), smoking habit (28.7%), obesity (27.9%), uncomplicated (10%), and complicated diabetes (9%). On the total, 339 patients were hospitalized in sub-intensive area, subjected to non-invasive ventilatory support. Hospitalization lasted about 7 days in the ordinary ward and 13 days in the sub-intensive area. One hundred six patients died. In the considered period, the mean percentage of deaths compared to hospitalizations in Italy was equal to 22.21%; in our experience, the overall mortality rate was 11%. Our organizational model, which included different intensity areas in the same ward and various specialist skills, as the ability to manage non-invasive ventilation and bedside ultrasound, allowed flexible management of the "complex" COVID patient. Even the mortality rate may be the result of this model. These features mark what modern Internal Medicine should be like.

Indexed as

ComplexityCOVID-19Health organizationInternal MedicinePandemicSub-intensive

Identifiers

PMID36320815
PMCPMC9610320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.