Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36320657›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2022

Patients' experience and satisfaction using telemedicine for outpatient services in a Tertiary Cancer Center in Qatar during COVID-19: A cross-sectional study.

Israa Elhakeem, Phool Iqbal, Abdulqadir J Nashwan, Muhammad Abubakar, Arsalan T Jawad, Mousa A AlHiyari, Prem Chandra, Maab A Osman, Sara S Mohamad, Mohammed Alkhatib and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Assessment of patient satisfaction levels with teleconsultation services at a tertiary care cancer center in a developing country: a cross-sectional study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Israa ElhakeemMedical Education Hamad Medical Corporation Doha Qatar.
Phool IqbalInternal Medicine Department New York Medical College/Metropolitan Hospital Center New York USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3472-9281
Abdulqadir J NashwanNursing Department Hamad Medical Corporation Doha Qatar.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4845-4119
Muhammad AbubakarMedical Education Hamad Medical Corporation Doha Qatar.
Arsalan T JawadMedical Education Hamad Medical Corporation Doha Qatar.
Mousa A AlHiyariMedical Education Hamad Medical Corporation Doha Qatar.
Prem ChandraAcademic Health System Hamad Medical Corporation Doha Qatar.
Maab A OsmanMedical Education Hamad Medical Corporation Doha Qatar.
Sara S MohamadMedical Education Hamad Medical Corporation Doha Qatar.
Mohammed AlkhatibMedical Education Hamad Medical Corporation Doha Qatar.
Mohamed A YassinMedical Critical Care Department Hamad Medical Corporation Qatar.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1144-8076

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aim: The coronavirus-19 is an ongoing global pandemic resulting in millions of deaths worldwide. For a patient population at higher risk of infection, telemedicine is a promising means of providing safe and alternative care routes while minimizing their risk of exposure. This study gives insight into patients' experiences and satisfaction with telemedicine during this pandemic. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study on 297 patients (RR: 85%) at the National Center for Cancer Care and Research (NCCCR), Qatar. Data was collected through electronic medical records of the eligibe patient population, and phone calls were made whereby the physician read a standard introductory script followed by a survey questionnaire. We focused on patients' experience with telemedicine services amid the pandemic. This was done using a six-point Likert scoring system of seven questions that were scaled from 1 to 6. Results: More than 80% of patients somewhat to strongly agreed that telemedicine met their healthcare needs, improved their confidence in their healthcare system, and were generally satisfied with the quality of care provided. Nearly all patients (90%) understood their physicians' recommendations over the phone. In addition, more than half of the patients (89%) felt they could freely communicate their concerns. Patients also showed an inclination towards face-to-face consultations at 68%; however, 90% were willing to participate in future teleconsultations. Conclusion: Our study indicates an overall positive experience among patients towards the use of telemedicine. Telemedicine is a safe, futuristic approach toward patient care management and, thus, provides healthcare professionals a platform to implement further patient and physician education. Even though our data also showed that patients liked in-person visits to some degree, this needs to be looked into more in future studies.

Indexed as

cancerCOVID‐19teleconsultationstelehealthtelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID36320657
PMCPMC9617592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.