ReviewIntensive care research2023
Effect of Fluid Resuscitation Strategies for Obese Patients with Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Systematic Review.
Review in Intensive care research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Restrictive fluid resuscitation versus liberal fluid resuscitation in patients with septic shock: comparison of outcomes.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- Ononin promotes survival rate in cecal ligation puncture-induced sepsis rat model by regulating inflammatory pathway.Acta cirurgica brasileira · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: As the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (2021) recommended, patients with sepsis should be given a liquid infusion of 30 ml/kg (ideal body weight). However, the strategy may result in insufficient resuscitation for obese patients with sepsis. Therefore, we conducted a systematic evaluation of the effectiveness of the initial resuscitation strategy in obese sepsis patients. Materials and methods: A computer search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, and other databases collected cohort studies from the beginning of the survey to December 2021 to include articles evaluating initial resuscitation strategies for sepsis-obese patients. Results: Of the six studies included, five used ideal body weight infusion strategies, and three used actual body weight infusion strategies. Differences in fluid volume were observed between the two strategies, but no significant difference was observed in the mortality of obese sepsis patients. In addition, there may be an infusion strategy other than the above two infusion methods, and the safety and efficacy of the new infusion strategy are unclear. The obesity paradox has been observed in most infusion strategies. Conclusion: The association between obesity and infusion strategy has rarely been investigated in patients with sepsis and septic shock, and the existing results are conflicting. The risk of bias in all included studies was moderate or high. Before providing broad recommendations on the optimal first resuscitation approach to lower the chance of mortality, further clinical trials, and prospective research need to be done.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.