Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36320632›Full record

ArticleEnergy and buildings2022

Energy efficiency in residential buildings amid COVID-19: A holistic comparative analysis between old and new normal occupancies.

Anber Rana, Mohammad Kamali, M Mohammed Riyadh, S Rubaiya Sultana, M Rubayat Kamal, M Shahria Alam, Kasun Hewage, Rehan Sadiq

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Energy and buildings, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anber RanaSchool of Engineering, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada.
Mohammad KamaliSchool of Engineering, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada.
M Mohammed RiyadhSchool of Engineering, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada.
S Rubaiya SultanaSchool of Engineering, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada.
M Rubayat KamalSchool of Engineering, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada.
M Shahria AlamSchool of Engineering, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada.
Kasun HewageSchool of Engineering, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada.
Rehan SadiqSchool of Engineering, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stringent lockdowns have been one of the defining features of the COVID-19 pandemic. Lockdowns have brought about drastic changes in living styles, including increased residential occupancy and telework practices predicted to last long. The variation in occupancy pattern and energy use needs to be assessed at the household level. Consequently, the new occupancy times will impact the performance of energy efficiency measures. To address these gaps, this work uses a real case study, a two-story residential building in the Okanagan Valley (British Columbia, Canada). Further, steady-state building energy simulations are performed on the HOT2000 tool to evaluate the resiliency of energy efficiency measures under a full lockdown. Three-year monitored energy data is analyzed to study the implications of COVID-19 lockdowns on HVAC and non-HVAC loads at a monthly temporal scale. The results show a marked change in energy use patterns and a higher increase in May 2020 compared to the previous two years. Calibrated energy models built on HOT2000 are then used to study the impacts of pre-COVID-19 (old normal occupancy) and post-COVID-19 (new normal occupancy) on energy upgrades performance. The simulations show that under higher occupancy times, the annual electricity use increased by 16.4%, while natural gas use decreased by 7.6%. The results indicate that overall residential buildings following pre-COVID-19 occupancy schedules had higher energy-saving potential than those with new normal occupancy. In addition, the variation in occupancy and stakeholder preferences directly impact the ranking of energy efficiency measures. Furthermore, this study identifies energy efficiency measures that provide flexibility for the decision-makers by identifying low-cost options feasible under a range of occupancy schedules.

Indexed as

3E analysisCOVID 19 pandemicEnergy efficiencyEnergy upgradesMCDAOccupancy profileResidential buildingsSustainability

Identifiers

PMID36320632
PMCPMC9612947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.