ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2022
Autologous Minimally Manipulated Homologous Adipose Tissue (AMHAT) for Treatment of Nonhealing Diabetic Foot Ulcers.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Clinical trials on 3D bioprinted scaffolds for lower extremity vascular, diabetic and pressure ulcers: a systematic review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Pooled it
- Application of 3D printing in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: current status and new insights.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Pooled it
- Three-dimensional bioprinted hydrogels for the management of diabetic wounds: A review.BioImpacts : BI · 2026Review
- Multiplexing 3D Natural Scaffolds to Optimize the Repair and Regeneration of Chronic Diabetic Wounds.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Repair, Regeneration, and Replacement, Revisited (Redux).Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2025Article
- Three-Dimensional Bioprinted Autologous Minimally Manipulated Homologous Adipose Tissue for Skin Defects After Wide Excision of Skin Cancer Provides Early Wound Closure and Good Esthetic Patient Satisfaction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- 3D Printing-Based Hydrogel Dressings for Wound Healing.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Review
- The promising approach of 3D bioprinting for diabetic foot ulcer treatment: A concise review of recent developments.Heliyon · 2024Review
- Using 3D Bioprinted Autologous Minimally Manipulated Homologous Adipose Tissue for Limb Salvage in Treating Diabetic Foot Ulcer.Archives of plastic surgery · 2024Article
- Safety assessment of a three-dimensional-printed autologous omentum patch: An application on the kidneys as a new treatment approach.Clinical and translational science · 2023Article
- Preparation of therapy-grade extracellular vesicles from adipose tissue to promote diabetic wound healing.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetic foot complications are increasingly burdensome for patients, clinicians, and society. Development of innovative therapies to support good quality basic care is a priority among those with an interest in this area. One of these involves scanning and printing tissues to match and conform to a defect (so-called 3D printing). Methods: A single-arm pilot study of ten consecutive patients with a history of a chronic diabetic foot ulcer (DFU), treated with autologous minimally manipulated homologous adipose tissue (AMHAT), dispensed by a specialized 3D bioprinter, Dr. INVIVO, was performed. Patients with nonhealing DFUs present for more than 4 weeks and refractory to standard-of-care therapies were included. Wounds were treated with a single application of AMHAT, and then followed up weekly for up to 12 weeks, or until the wounds healed. The primary outcome measure was complete epithelialization of the wound up to 12 weeks after the treatment. Secondary outcome measures included wound size and/or volume reduction, assessment of ulcer grade, and time to closure. Results: Five wounds were healed by 5 weeks and one at 8 weeks. The mean percent area reduction at 12 weeks was 78.3% (SD: 33.23). Complete closure was achieved in 60% of wounds. The mean time to closure in these wounds was 49.1 days (95% CI, 29.9-68.3). No adverse events were reported. Conclusions: Single treatment of bioprinted AMHAT appears to be a safe and potentially effective treatment modality for patients with chronic DFUs. Further studies are warranted to explore the full potential of 3D bioprinting for tissue repair in this high-risk population.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.