ArticlePeerJ2022
Retrospective study of intrapartum fever in term pregnancies and adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes.
Article in PeerJ, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effect of intrapartum maternal fever on neonatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Pooled it
- Independent and synergistic effects of OGTT-based hyperglycemia phenotypes and gestational weight gain on feto-maternal outcomes in GDM.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- The impact of Vaginal Flora Screening in the third trimester on pregnancy outcomes in primiparas undergoing vaginal delivery: a retrospective cohort study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- The Prevalence of Perineal Tears Among Women Having Spontaneous Vaginal Births with Intrapartum Fever.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Maternal bacteremia in intrapartum fever: the role of ampicillin resistance and prolonged membrane rupture-a retrospective comparative study.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2025Article
- Machine Learning-Driven Intrapartum Fever Prediction: A Comprehensive Large Retrospective Cohort Study Integrating Inflammatory and Obstetric Markers.International journal of general medicine · 2025Article
- Development and Validation of Dynamic Nomograms for Predicting Delivery Mode and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Admission in Intrapartum Fever: A Retrospective Cohort Study.International journal of women's health · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a prediction model for intrapartum fever related to chorioamnionitis in parturients undergoing epidural analgesia.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Duration time of labor progression for pregnant women of vaginal birth after cesarean in Hubei, China.Irish journal of medical science · 2024Article
- Construction of a nomogram model for predicting infectious intrapartum fever.Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Intrapartum fever is a well-known predisposing factor for severe perinatal outcomes. Herein, we explored the intrapartum features, obstetric outcomes, and neonatal outcomes in relation to the extent of intrapartum fever Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis consisting of 575 term, singleton live births in one medical center from January 1st to December 31st, 2020 was carried out. Parturients who had experienced a maximal intrapartum fever of <38.0 °C were compared with two sub-groups of parturients who had experienced respective maximal fevers of 38.0-38.9 °C and ≥39.0 °C. We computed the adjusted risks for adverse perinatal outcomes Results: There were statistically remarkable differences among the three groups in 13 items including body mass index, epidural, and WBC before delivery ( Conclusions: Intrapartum fever is an important indicator of adverse perinatal outcomes. The higher the temperature, the higher risk of histological chorioamnionitis, as well as the risk of neonatal sepsis and neonatal intensive care unit admission.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.