ArticleRSC advances2022
Superiority of biomimetic micelle-entrapped nanoporous silica xerogel to deliver poorly water-soluble itraconazole.
Article in RSC advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nanoporous-based biomaterials in biomedical applications: from fundamentals and biosensing to drug delivery, wound healing, and tissue engineering.Nanoscale advances · 2026Review
- Contribution of molecular-modified biomimetic mesoporous silica xerogel in delivering nimesulide with superior anti-inflammatory efficacy.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2025Article
- Itraconazole-Loaded Ufasomes: Evaluation, Characterization, and Anti-Fungal Activity againstPharmaceutics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Micelle-entrapped silica xerogel (M-Silica xerogel) was biomimetically synthesized to combine the advantages of micelles and silica xerogel to load poorly water-soluble drug itraconazole (ITZ). Tween 20, tween 40, and tween 80 were applied to prepare micelles as the templates for M20-Silica xerogel, M40-Silica xerogel, and M80-Silica xerogel, respectively. During the silica frame construction, the surfactant formed a micelle as the porous template, silicon hydroxyl groups interacted with the hydrophilic parts of the micelle, and polyethylenimine catalyzed silica polycondensation owing to its amino groups, resulting in the formation of the M-Silica xerogels. The results showed that the particle size of the sub-particles from the M40-Silica xerogel was larger than from the M20-Silica xerogel, and the M80-Silica xerogel was the largest among these three samples, demonstrating that the emulsifying ability had a direct impact on the particle size of the M-Silica xerogel. The M-Silica xerogel had a large pore size in the range of 10-50 nm. Small mesopores (2-5 nm) dominated the pore size of the M20-Silica xerogel, while medium mesopores (5-10 nm) occupied most the pore distribution of the M40-Silica xerogel, and large mesopores (10-50 nm) shouldered most the pore distribution for the M80-Silica xerogel. Among these three drug-loaded carriers, the M40-Silica xerogel with the largest amount of medium mesopores presented the best ITZ-release behavior, demonstrating that medium mesopores facilitated drug release, while small mesopores impeded drug release and large mesopores were not favorable to retaining amorphous drugs in the pores.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.