Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36320474›Full record

ArticleChemical science2022

Navigating chemical reaction space - application to DNA-encoded chemistry.

Silvia Chines, Christiane Ehrt, Marco Potowski, Felix Biesenkamp, Lars Grützbach, Susanne Brunner, Frederik van den Broek, Shilpa Bali, Katja Ickstadt, Andreas Brunschweiger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Silvia ChinesTU Dortmund University, Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology Otto-Hahn-Str. 6 44227 Dortmund Germany andreas.brunschweiger@tu-dortmund.de.
Christiane EhrtUniversität Hamburg Bundesstr. 43 20146 Hamburg Germany.
Marco PotowskiTU Dortmund University, Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology Otto-Hahn-Str. 6 44227 Dortmund Germany andreas.brunschweiger@tu-dortmund.de.
Felix BiesenkampTU Dortmund University, Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology Otto-Hahn-Str. 6 44227 Dortmund Germany andreas.brunschweiger@tu-dortmund.de.
Lars GrützbachTU Dortmund University, Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology Otto-Hahn-Str. 6 44227 Dortmund Germany andreas.brunschweiger@tu-dortmund.de.
Susanne BrunnerTU Dortmund University, Department of Statistics Vogelpothsweg 87 44227 Dortmund Germany.
Frederik van den BroekElsevier B.V. Radarweg 29 1043 NX Amsterdam The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6398-2457
Shilpa BaliElsevier B.V. Radarweg 29 1043 NX Amsterdam The Netherlands.
Katja IckstadtTU Dortmund University, Department of Statistics Vogelpothsweg 87 44227 Dortmund Germany.
Andreas BrunschweigerTU Dortmund University, Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology Otto-Hahn-Str. 6 44227 Dortmund Germany andreas.brunschweiger@tu-dortmund.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4401-1495

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Databases contain millions of reactions for compound synthesis, rendering selection of reactions for forward synthetic design of small molecule screening libraries, such as DNA-encoded libraries (DELs), a big data challenge. To support reaction space navigation, we developed the computational workflow Reaction Navigator. Reaction files from a large chemistry database were processed using the open-source KNIME Analytics Platform. Initial processing steps included a customizable filtering cascade that removed reactions with a high probability to be incompatible with DEL, as they would

Identifiers

PMID36320474
PMCPMC9517168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.