ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2022
Successful visualization of pulmonary embolism using fluoroscopic video analysis in a patient with iodine contrast allergy: a case report.
Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Diagnostic performance of fluoroscopic video analysis for pulmonary embolism: a prospective observational study.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2024Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) is commonly used to diagnose pulmonary embolism (PE). However, a history of iodine contrast allergy presents a dilemma in the management of patients with PE. As an alternative approach, X-ray fluoroscopic video analysis has been recently reported to be useful in diagnosing PE. Case summary: A 78-year-old man with dyspnoea of 1-month duration visited our hospital. His oxygen saturation was 89%, and echocardiography demonstrated right heart strain. We could not perform contrast-enhanced CT because the patient had a history of contrast allergy and refused to undergo premedicated contrast CT with anti-histamine and/or corticosteroid. Therefore, a video analysis of pulmonary circulation using dynamic chest X-ray (DCR) was performed. The reconstructed pseudo-colour video showed defects of pulmonary circulation in both lung areas. We diagnosed PE and started anticoagulant therapy. Multiple segmental defects were also observed in pulmonary perfusion scintigraphy on Day 3, which confirmed the diagnosis of PE. He was discharged on Day 9, and an improvement of the pulmonary circulation as assessed with DCR was observed. He had no symptoms at the last follow-up visit at 1 year after discharge. Discussion: We describe the successful visualization of PE using DCR in a patient with iodine contrast allergy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.