Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36320346›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)2022

Identification of dementia and MCI cases in health information systems: An Italian validation study.

Ilaria Bacigalupo, Flavia L Lombardo, Anna Maria Bargagli, Silvia Cascini, Nera Agabiti, Marina Davoli, Silvia Scalmana, Annalisa Di Palma, Annarita Greco, Marina Rinaldi and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A new national survey of centers for cognitive disorders and dementias in Italy.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Ilaria BacigalupoNational Center for Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Italian National Institute of Health Rome Italy.
Flavia L LombardoNational Center for Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Italian National Institute of Health Rome Italy.
Anna Maria BargagliDepartment of Epidemiology Lazio Regional Health Service Rome Italy.
Silvia CasciniDepartment of Epidemiology Lazio Regional Health Service Rome Italy.
Nera AgabitiDepartment of Epidemiology Lazio Regional Health Service Rome Italy.
Marina DavoliDepartment of Epidemiology Lazio Regional Health Service Rome Italy.
Silvia ScalmanaPrimary Care Health Authority of Lazio Region Rome Italy.
Annalisa Di PalmaLocal Health Authority Naples 1 Campania Region Naples Italy.
Annarita GrecoHealth Authority of Campania Region Naples Italy.
Marina RinaldiHealth Authority of Campania Region Naples Italy.
Roberta GiordanaSoresa Campania Regional Healthcare Agency Naples Italy.
Daniele ImperialeNeurology Unit ASL Città di Torino Turin Italy.
Piero SecretoGeriatric unit Local Health Authority TO3 Piemonte Region Turin Italy.
Natalia GoliniEpidemiology Unit Local Health Authority TO3 Piemonte Region Grugliasco Italy.
Roberto GnaviEpidemiology Unit Local Health Authority TO3 Piemonte Region Grugliasco Italy.
Franca LovaldiHealth Department Piemonte Region Turin Italy.
Carlo A BiaginiGeriatric Local Health Authority Pistoia Italy.
Elisa GualdaniEpidemiology Unit Toscana Regional Health Agency Florence Italy.
Paolo FrancesconiEpidemiology Unit Toscana Regional Health Agency Florence Italy.
Natalia MagliocchettiGeneral Directorate for Health Prevention Ministry of Health Rome Italy.
Teresa Di FiandraGeneral Directorate for Health Prevention Ministry of Health Rome Italy.
Nicola VanacoreNational Center for Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Italian National Institute of Health Rome Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The identification of dementia cases through routinely collected health data represents an easily accessible and inexpensive method to estimate the prevalence of dementia. In Italy, a project aimed at the validation of an algorithm was conducted. Methods: The project included cases (patients with dementia or mild cognitive impairment [MCI]) recruited in centers for cognitive disorders and dementias and controls recruited in outpatient units of geriatrics and neurology. The algorithm based on pharmaceutical prescriptions, hospital discharge records, residential long-term care records, and information on exemption from health-care co-payment, was applied to the validation population. Results: The main analysis was conducted on 1110 cases and 1114 controls. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values in discerning cases of dementia were 74.5%, 96.0%, 94.9%, and 79.1%, respectively, whereas in detecting cases of MCI these values were 29.7%, 97.5%, 92.2%, and 58.1%, respectively. The variables associated with misclassification of cases were also identified. Discussion: This study provided a validated algorithm, based on administrative data, which can be used to identify cases with dementia and, with lower sensitivity, also early onset dementia but not cases with MCI.

Indexed as

algorithmDementiaearly onset dementiahealth electronic datamild cognitive impairmentprevalencevalidation

Identifiers

PMID36320346
PMCPMC9617569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.